City of Philadelphia Kenneth Erhart SOC 101

assistance with my Week 5 Research Paper. The focus of this paper is to explore how residential patterns affect intergroup relations. You will use research approaches such as observation and secondary data analysis to further understand your community. You will need to choose whether you will research your city, county, or state. Be sure to choose a large enough geographic area to perform meaningful analysis. For example, if you live in Hawaii, you may want to research your state. If you live in a small town, you may want to research your county. If you live in Atlanta or another big city, researching at the city level should be fine. Step 1: Using Secondary DataUse the data gathered on your chosen locality in the Week Three assignment, “Demographic Report,” . If more data is needed, use demographic data from the latest census (available online using the US Census American FactFinder) and identify the various social and economic characteristics (i. e. , education, population, housing, race, class, etc. ) of this locale. You can also check government websites for your state, county or city for data. Present your findings in two to three pages of the paper. Step 2: Using an Observational StudyTaking the information you have gathered in Step 1 regarding social and economic characteristics, and take 30 to 60 minutes observing your community or use a newspaper if you’re unable to physically go to your community. Take notes of what you observe. Compare this data to what was found in the census data and make note if there are differences. Present your findings in one to two pages of the paper. Step 3: Analysis and Reporting of ResearchAnalyze your data and present your responses in two to three pages in the paper: Describe how segregated the neighborhoods are in your locality. Be sure to consider the various social inequality indicators: race, ethnicity, class, gender, and perhaps sexuality for some areas. Indicate if there are policies, practices, or specific circumstances that have created and maintained these patterns. Here are some examples of aspects to consider: Historically, has there always been racial segregation or not? Was it traditionally an area of immigration from a certain ethnic region? Is there an LGBT community? Was it an industrial area that had a strong working class community, or is it a technology area with highly educated citizens? Have there been efforts to desegregate or plans in the future?In Chapter 1 and throughout the text, you have explored several sociological theoretical perspectives. Indicate which theoretical perspective best presents your analysis of your locality. Describe why you have chosen this theoretical perspective and ensure you include detail on which theorist’s work is most representative. The Research Paper: Must be seven to nine double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least five scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference pageCity of PhiladelphiaCity of PhiladelphiaKenneth ErhartSOC 101Instructor: Megan ReidJuly 07, 2015City of PhiladelphiaThe locality chosen is the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the following is thegeneral socio-economic information on the location as per the 2010 United States Census. The population at the time was estimated to be around 1,526,006 people whocomprised 590,071 households, and an aggregate of 352,272 families that was permanentlyliving in the consolidated city-county of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The population densityfor the city was around 4,337. 3/km² (11,233. 6/mi²). The male population was 731,161 whilethe female population was estimated to be 813,388. The percentage change observed in thepopulation since the year 2001 was 31. 1%, this decreased to 1. 1% in since the year 2010(U. S. Census Bureau, 2001). The racial constitution of the city as at the year 2013 when the census was beingconducted comprised 45. 5% White which translates to about 637,842, 44. 2% Black whichrepresents a figure of about 665,332 , 6. 9% Asian which in numbers is equivalent to 99,962,88,827 which in percentage form is 2. 3% were from other races, 38,949 which in percentageform is 2. 4% constituted of the Mixed Race, 0. 8% Native American which is 4,433 and194,714 which in percentage form is 13. 3% of the population were Hispanic or Latino(Fields, 2004). The average number of housing units at an average density of 1,891. 9/km²(4,900. 1/mi²) was estimated to be were 661,958. Among the 590071 housing units that wereprofiled in the survey, at least 27. 6% had children under the age of eighteen that werecohabiting with them. Among this 32. 1% were legally married couples that were still sharinga home. It was observed that at least 22. 3% of the housing units had a female occupant thatwas yet to be married and 40. 3% were non-families. 3. 8% of this housing units comprisedsolely of individuals and 11. 9% had a solitary occupant who averaged in age over 65 years. City of PhiladelphiaThe mean household size was 2. 48, and the average family size was 3. 22 (National ResearchCouncil U. S. Et al, 2010). The income per household in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania averaged at $30,746 and themedian income for a family was $37,036. The males in the society had a higher medianincome of $34,199 while the women had $28,477. The city has a relatively high per capitaincome of $16, 509, considering the population. The population consisted of at least 22. 9% ofindividuals and 18. 4 family units that ranked below the poverty line. In terms of age groupsthat wee under the poverty line, it was estimated that 31. 3% of the individuals under the ageof eighteen and 16. 9% for the senior citizens above 65years old, lived primarily under thepoverty line (U. S. Census Bureau, 2011). The population disparity concerning age was 25. 3% under the age of 18, 11. 1% werein the age group 18 to 24, 29. 3% aged between 25 to 44, 20. 3% were found to be 45 to 64,and 14. 1% consisted of the senior citizens that were 65 years of age or older. The median agewas rightly approximated at 34 years. The females outnumbered the males as for every 86. 8men there were 100 women (Ennis Et al, 2011). This could be further proved y zoning downinto those aged 18 and over whom for every 100 women, 81. 8 males were observed. Thegender disparity in the population of the city was astounding as the male to female ratio was86. 8 to 100. If these figures were to be changed into percentages, males would be 46. 5% ofthe population while females were 53. 5%. Amongst all the regions in the country that wereprofiled at the same time with Philadelphia, Pennsylvania city that averaged an excess of ahundred thousand people, this was the third lowest in the United States. Only Indiana,Alabama. Gary and Birmingham had a high proportion of women abiding in the city(Fronczek, 2009). City of PhiladelphiaThe housing units that were profiled in the census comprised of those that werecurrently occupied and those that were vacant. Those that had people living in them were590,071 which when converted into a percentage was 89. 1%, and those that were consideredvacant were 71,887 which when converted into a percentage was 10. 9%. The houses that wereoccupied could be divided into those that were owner occupied and those that were tenantoccupied. Those, where the occupant was the landlord, were 349,633 which in percentageform were 59. 3% and where rent had to be paid 240,438 which in percentage form were40. 7% (Ennis Et al, 2011). The population is divided in the means they use in getting to work. Most of those thatlived near the workplaces preferred just to walk to work. This was especially the case forCentre City residents. Overall, the population that walked to walked was approximately9. 22%. Of the population that commuted to work, at least 63. 97% of all Philadelphians wereobserved to drive an automobile or carpool to work while at least 25. 93% preferred to use thepublic service vehicles to commute to work (National Research Council U. S. Et al, 2010). Anegligible number got to work by riding a bicycle. Of the households that were profiled atleast 35. 74 of these did not have automobiles for one reason or another. In comparison toother major cities in the United States of America, the proportion of Philadelphians that donot commute by automobiles is relatively higher. But cities like New York and Washingtonhave higher percentages of those that do not commute by automobile as compared toPhiladelphia. The survey carried out in the city, came to the revelation that the average time ittook an individual that was at least sixteen years of age or older to get to work wasapproximately thirty-two minutes. However in comparison to residents that lived away fromthe city centre, those that were from the centre city had much shorter commutes thus shorterarrival times to work. Amongst all the cities that were profiled, Philadelphia was ranked asthe city with the most individuals that lived in downtown areas, this was especially the caseCity of Philadelphiain Centre City, which was ranked number three overall for largest downtown residentialpopulation in the country (Fields, 2004). The education attainment rate for high school level students or higher is put at81. 2%. In relation to other cities, Philadelphia city has a relatively higher figures when itcomes to school enrolment, These figures are observed across all age groups. The city ofPhiladelphia is endowed with massive resources that are geared toward the provision ofquality education facilities for all the students. The leadership in the city is committedtowards the constant improvement of their education systems. The city is ranked the 8thlargest school district in America with at least 300000 college students, numerous parochialand private high schools (U. S. Census Bureau, 2011). The city of Philadelphia is a multicultural society that consists of the Hispanic, whitemajority and the black people among other peoples. The education system is robust, andsystems are continually being introduced to ensure improvement. These education institutionscater for all the races and cultures that are present in the city. The housing sector iscontinually under pressure to grow due to the growing population. The housing sector in thecity is manned by the city council of Philadelphia. The dominant age group as observed fromthe statistics above consists mostly of the senior youth who are above 33. 6 years. The incomepatterns of the city residents indicate a robust and steadily growing economy. City of PhiladelphiaReferencesEnnis, S. R. , Ríos-Vargas, M. , &amp, Albert, N. G. (2011). The hispanic population: 2010. USDepartment of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US CensusBureau. Fields, J. M. (2004). America’s families and living arrangements: 2003. US Department ofCommerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau. Fronczek, P. (2009). Income, earnings, and poverty from the 2004 American CommunitySurvey. DIANE Publishing. National Research Council (U. S. ). , In Schirm, A. L. , &amp, In Kirkendall, N. J. (2010). Developing and evaluating methods for using American Community Surveydata to support the school meals programs: Interim report. U. S. Census Bureau,. (2011). American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2006-2010: Population and housing characteristics: ACS DVD (2006-2010). U. S. Census Bureau. (2001). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs: Implementingthe American Community Survey. Washington, D. C. : U. S. Dept. of Commerce,Economics and Statistics Administration, U. S. Census Bureau.