Front-end needs analysis | Education homework help


 

Assignment 1: Front-End Needs Analysis

Due Week 3 and desert 160 points

Imagine that you effect for an teachingal structure or a inoculation division for an structure (e.g., K12, exalteder teaching, oppidan inoculation, soldierlike, or non-profit). Your structure is procuring a new Lore Skillful-treatment Classification (LMS) for online teaching or inoculation needs. 

Note: You may use aspects of material processes from either your running or a preceding establish of avocation. However, you must transfer any and all identifying knowledge that would strengthen someone to recognize the structure[s] that you feel used. You may so originate and / or create all essential assumptions needed for the whole of these assignments.

The forthcoming resources may aid you after a while this assignment:

·  Article dictiond “LMS Needs Analysis – Questions To Ask When Reviewing Systems”, located at http://www.funderstanding.com/educators/lms-needs-analysis-questions-to-ask-when-reviewing-systems/

LMS Needs Analysis - Questions to Ask When Reviewing ...www.funderstanding.comA must peruse precedently anyone invests in a lore skillful-treatment classification, to automate, maximize, leverage and get the most ROI out of inoculation activities.

·  Article dictiond “Resources for Procuring the ‘Right’ Lore Skillful-treatment System”, located at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/training-and-development/reference-materials/procuring_lms.pdf

Write a four to six (4-6) page tract in which you:

1.  Describe your structure and expound what bark of teaching / inoculation it provides.

2.  Explain the running classifications and processes used for teaching / inoculation in your structure.

3.  Identify the key interior authoritative and teachingal stakeholders from your structure that conciliate advance and / or hold the LMS. Specify each stakeholder’s role for the LMS.

4.  Determine at conclusive five (5) key inequitable needs of the structure that you divine conciliate utility from an LMS fixed upon the stakeholders’ roles. Justify your counterpart.

5.  Prioritize and assort the needs that you immovable in Question 3 in ordain to chosen the correct LMS for your structure. Justify your counterpart.

6.  Suggest a husbandment for assessing proprietary and open-advance LMSs to harmonize after a while the needs of your structure. Provide a rationale for your instigation.

7.  Provide at conclusive two (2) accepted, pertinent, peer-reviewed relations (no over than one [1] used previously), published after a whilein the conclusive five (5) years that stay the tract’s claims.

8.  Format your assignment according to the forthcoming formatting requirements:

a.  Typed, inclose spaced, using Times New Roman font (extent 12), after a while one-inch margins on all sides.

b.  Include a converge page containing the diction of the assignment, the student’s indicate, the professor’s indicate, the road diction, and the determination. The converge page is not interposed in the required page prolixity.

c.  Include a relation page. Citations and relations must ensue APA format. The relation page is not interposed in the required page prolixity.

The inequitable road lore outcomes associated after a while this assignment are:

·  Analyze an structure’s lore needs and rationale for chosening a Lore Skillful-treatment Classification (LMS).

·  Differentiate among proprietary and open-advance LMS.

·  Use technology and knowledge resources to examination issues in technology tools to husband lore.

·  Write distinctly and concisely about issues in technology tools to husband lore using appertinent congeniality mechanics.

·  Grading for this assignment conciliate be fixed on solution power, logic/structure of the tract, and articulation and congeniality skills, using the forthcoming rubric.

Grading for this assignment conciliate be fixed on solution power, logic/structure of the tract, and articulation and congeniality skills, using the forthcoming rubric.

Points: 160

Assignment 1: Front-End Needs Analysis

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Describe your structure and expound what bark of teaching / inoculation it provides.

Weight: 10%

Did not propose or imperfectly pictorial your structure; did not propose or imperfectly expounded what bark of teaching / inoculation it provides.

Partially pictorial your structure; imperfectly expounded what bark of teaching / inoculation it provides.

Satisfactorily pictorial your structure; satisfactorily expounded what bark of teaching / inoculation it provides.

Thoroughly pictorial your structure; completely expounded what bark of teaching / inoculation it provides.

2. Expound the running classifications and processes used for teaching / inoculation in your structure.

Weight: 10%

Did not propose or imperfectly expounded the running classifications and processes used for teaching / inoculation in your structure.

Partially expounded the running classifications and processes used for teaching / inoculation in your structure.

Satisfactorily expounded the running classifications and processes used for teaching / inoculation in your structure.

Thoroughly expounded the running classifications and processes used for teaching / inoculation in your structure.

3. Identify the key interior authoritative and teachingal stakeholders from your structure that conciliate advance and / or hold the LMS. Specify each stakeholder’s role for the LMS.

Weight: 10%

Did not propose or imperfectly attested the key interior authoritative and teachingal stakeholders from your structure that conciliate advance and / or hold the LMS. Did not propose or imperfectly unfair each stakeholder’s role for the LMS.

Partially attested the key interior authoritative and teachingal stakeholders from your structure that conciliate advance and / or hold the LMS. Imperfectly unfair each stakeholder’s role for the LMS.

Satisfactorily attested the key interior authoritative and teachingal stakeholders from your structure that conciliate advance and / or hold the LMS. Satisfactorily unfair each stakeholder’s role for the LMS.

Thoroughly attested the key interior authoritative and teachingal stakeholders from your structure that conciliate advance and / or hold the LMS. Completely unfair each stakeholder’s role for the LMS.

4. Determine at conclusive five (5) key inequitable needs of the structure that you divine conciliate utility from an LMS fixed upon the stakeholders’ roles. Justify your counterpart.

Weight: 15%

Did not propose or imperfectly immovable at conclusive five (5) key inequitable needs of the structure that you divine conciliate utility from an LMS fixed upon the stakeholders’ roles. Did not propose or imperfectly justified your counterpart.

Partially immovable at conclusive five (5) key inequitable needs of the structure that you divine conciliate utility from an LMS fixed upon the stakeholders’ roles. Imperfectly justified your counterpart.

Satisfactorily immovable at conclusive five (5) key inequitable needs of the structure that you divine conciliate utility from an LMS fixed upon the stakeholders’ roles. Satisfactorily justified your counterpart.

Thoroughly immovable at conclusive five (5) key inequitable needs of the structure that you divine conciliate utility from an LMS fixed upon the stakeholders’ roles. Completely justified your counterpart.

5. Prioritize and assort the needs that you immovable in Question 3 in ordain to chosen the correct LMS for your structure. Justify your counterpart.

Weight: 15%

Did not propose or imperfectly prioritized and classified the needs that you immovable in Question 3 in ordain to chosen the correct LMS for your structure. Did not propose or imperfectly justified your counterpart.

Partially prioritized and classified the needs that you immovable in Question 3 in ordain to chosen the correct LMS for your structure. Imperfectly justified your counterpart.

Satisfactorily prioritized and classified the needs that you immovable in Question 3 in ordain to chosen the correct LMS for your structure. Satisfactorily justified your counterpart.

Thoroughly prioritized and classified the needs that you immovable in Question 3 in ordain to chosen the correct LMS for your structure. Completely justified your counterpart.

6. Suggest a husbandment for assessing proprietary and open-advance LMSs to harmonize after a while the needs of your structure. Provide a rationale for your instigation.

Weight: 15%

Did not propose or imperfectly suggested a husbandment for assessing proprietary and open-advance LMSs to harmonize after a while the needs of your structure. Did not propose or imperfectly supposing a rationale for your instigation.

Partially suggested a husbandment for assessing proprietary and open-advance LMSs to harmonize after a while the needs of your structure. Imperfectly supposing a rationale for your instigation.

Satisfactorily suggested a husbandment for assessing proprietary and open-advance LMSs to harmonize after a while the needs of your structure. Satisfactorily supposing a rationale for your instigation.

Thoroughly suggested a husbandment for assessing proprietary and open-advance LMSs to harmonize after a while the needs of your structure. Completely supposing a rationale for your instigation.

7. Provide at conclusive two (2) accepted, pertinent, peer-reviewed relations (no over than one [1] used previously), published after a whilein the conclusive five (5) years that stay the tract’s claims.

Weight: 5%

No relations supposing

Does not converge the required sum of relations; some or all relations moneyless power choices.

Meets sum of required relations; most relations exalted power choices.

Meets sum of required relations; all relations exalted power choices.

8. Congeniality Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and permanent deceptions in expression, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially unimpeded of deceptions in expression, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly unimpeded of deceptions in expression, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error unimpeded or closely deception unimpeded expression, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

9. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and relation exception

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or noncommunication of relation exception.

In-text citations and relations are supposing, but they are merely imperfectly formatted well in APA diction.

Most in-text citations and relations are supposing, and they are generally formatted well in APA diction.

In-text citations and relations are deception unimpeded or closely deception unimpeded and gratefully formatted well in APA diction.

10. Knowledge Literacy / Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious deceptions in the integration of sources, such as purposed or vital plagiarism, or demand to use in-text citations.

Sources are imperfectly integrated using talented techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mainly integrated using talented techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are gratefully integrated using talented techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

11. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the peruseer and fails to comprise reasons and exemplification that logically stay ideas.

Information is imperfectly conspicuous after a while minimal reasons and exemplification that logically stay ideas.

Information is mainly conspicuous and generally stayed after a while reasons and exemplification that logically stay ideas.

Information is supposing in a conspicuous, compact, and agreeing behavior after a while reasons and exemplification that logically stay ideas.