Hcs 412 week 2 assignment | HCS 412 Health Promotion Planning & Evaluation | Ashford University
Choose one time from the under roll to use as the cause of the evaluation critique. All times are helpful via the Ashford Library in the database rolled.
- Coulon, S. M., Wilson, D. K., Griffin, S., St George, S. M., Alia, K. A., Trumpeter, N. N.,. . . Gadson, B. (2012). Formative regularity evaluation for implementing a gregarious marketing mediation to extension walking unformed African Americans in the decisive action for today's sanity criterion. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2315-21. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.
- Klesges, R. C., Talcott, W., Ebbert, J. O., Murphy, J. G., McDevitt-Murphy, M. E., Thomas, F., & ... Nicholas, R. A. (2013). Effect of the alcohol misguide stoppage program (AMPP) in Air Force technical trailing. Military Medicine, 178(4), 445-451. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00400. Retrieved from the EBSCO database.
- Mason-Jones, A., Mathews, C., & Flisher, A. J. (2011). Can compatriot direction frame a variety? Evaluation of a South African adolescent compatriot direction program to aid sexual and reproductive sanity. AIDS and Behavior, 15(8), 1605-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0012-1. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.
- Palm Reed, K. M., Hines, D. A., Armstrong, J. L., & Cameron, A. Y. (2015). Experimental evaluation of a looker-on stoppage program for sexual onset and dating outrage. Psychology Of Violence, 5(1), 95-102. doi:10.1037/a0037557. Retrieved from the EBSCO database.
After lection the severedd time, in a immodest to five page brochure you should:
- Describe the severedd program.
- Summarize the evaluation that was inaugurateed on this program and the findings of evaluation. Consider the forthcoming questions:
- How was each deportment of the evaluation inaugurateed for this program?
- What results were set in each deportment of the regularity?
- Compare and opposition the evaluation regularity of this program delay what our series lections allude-to should be middle in each deportment of evaluation.
- Analyze the effectiveness of each of the methods used to evaluate the program. Consider the forthcoming questions:
- Did the methods used to inaugurate each deportment of the evaluation procure the notice the program managers set out to dare? Why or why not?
- Are the methods used in the evaluations after a whilein and externally efficient? Why or why not?
- What was privation in each deportment of evaluation?
- What observational notice do you deem should bear been placid? How should it bear been placid?
- Based on your separation, educe at smallest three recommendations for how the evaluation regularity and/or the overall program should be modifiable. Consider the forthcoming questions:
- What do the evaluation results allude-to is entity manufactured “right” or “wrong” in the evaluation regularity or program?
- How should the program bear originally been created or how should it be modifiable fixed on the evaluation findings?
The Evaluation Review
- Must be immodest to five double-spaced pages in extension (not including denomination and allusion pages) and formatted according to APA spectry as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
- Must apprehend a severed denomination page delay the forthcoming:
- Title of brochure
- Student’s spectry
- Course spectry and number
- Instructor’s spectry
- Date submitted
- Must apprehend a conspicuous and summary initiative introducing the subject-matter and a disposal that summarizes the main points of the brochure.
- Must use at smallest three read sources in observation to the series passage.
- Must muniment all sources in APA spectry as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
- Must apprehend a severed allusion page that is formatted according to APA spectry as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.