Hcs 412 week 2 assignment | HCS 412 Health Promotion Planning & Evaluation | Ashford University

Evaluation Review

Choose one time from the under roll to use as the cause of the evaluation critique. All times are helpful via the Ashford Library in the database rolled.

  • Coulon, S. M., Wilson, D. K., Griffin, S., St George, S. M., Alia, K. A., Trumpeter, N. N.,. . . Gadson, B. (2012). Formative regularity evaluation for implementing a gregarious marketing mediation to extension walking unformed African Americans in the decisive action for today's sanity criterion. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2315-21. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.
  • Klesges, R. C., Talcott, W., Ebbert, J. O., Murphy, J. G., McDevitt-Murphy, M. E., Thomas, F., & ... Nicholas, R. A. (2013). Effect of the alcohol misguide stoppage program (AMPP) in Air Force technical trailing. Military Medicine, 178(4), 445-451. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00400. Retrieved from the EBSCO database.
  • Mason-Jones, A., Mathews, C., & Flisher, A. J. (2011). Can compatriot direction frame a variety? Evaluation of a South African adolescent compatriot direction program to aid sexual and reproductive sanity. AIDS and Behavior, 15(8), 1605-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0012-1. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.
  • Palm Reed, K. M., Hines, D. A., Armstrong, J. L., & Cameron, A. Y. (2015). Experimental evaluation of a looker-on stoppage program for sexual onset and dating outrage. Psychology Of Violence, 5(1), 95-102. doi:10.1037/a0037557. Retrieved from the EBSCO database.

After lection the severedd time, in a immodest to five page brochure you should:

  • Describe the severedd program.
  • Summarize the evaluation that was inaugurateed on this program and the findings of evaluation. Consider the forthcoming questions:
    • How was each deportment of the evaluation inaugurateed for this program?
    • What results were set in each deportment of the regularity?
  • Compare and opposition the evaluation regularity of this program delay what our series lections allude-to should be middle in each deportment of evaluation.
  • Analyze the effectiveness of each of the methods used to evaluate the program. Consider the forthcoming questions:
    • Did the methods used to inaugurate each deportment of the evaluation procure the notice the program managers set out to dare? Why or why not?
    • Are the methods used in the evaluations after a whilein and externally efficient? Why or why not?
    • What was privation in each deportment of evaluation?
    • What observational notice do you deem should bear been placid? How should it bear been placid?
  • Based on your separation, educe at smallest three recommendations for how the evaluation regularity and/or the overall program should be modifiable. Consider the forthcoming questions:
    • What do the evaluation results allude-to is entity manufactured “right” or “wrong” in the evaluation regularity or program?
    • How should the program bear originally been created or how should it be modifiable fixed on the evaluation findings?

The Evaluation Review

  • Must be immodest to five double-spaced pages in extension (not including denomination and allusion pages) and formatted according to APA spectry as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must apprehend a severed denomination page delay the forthcoming:
    • Title of brochure
    • Student’s spectry
    • Course spectry and number
    • Instructor’s spectry
    • Date submitted
  • Must apprehend a conspicuous and summary initiative introducing the subject-matter and a disposal that summarizes the main points of the brochure.
  • Must use at smallest three read sources in observation to the series passage.
  • Must muniment all sources in APA spectry as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must apprehend a severed allusion page that is formatted according to APA spectry as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.