Reflection paper | philosophy | Dallas County Community College District
You procure transcribe a 1000-1500 expression reply to your chosen pamphlet subject-matter from the roll underneath. The doctrines are located in the ultimate period of the required textbook.
See Sequence Outline for the due age.
This assignment is rate 300 summits, or 30% of your gradation.
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Students procure prove their power to frame subject-matters about issues of twain identical and embracing meaning. Their letter should prove that they can frame cogent, condensed, and logically close subject-matters.
Students should prove that they can separate the applictalented summits that frame a logically close subject-matter. They should to-boot be talented to frame criticisms which effectively subvert, through the use of embezzle counter-examples, some forestate of that subject-matter.
Your assignment is to interpret any ONE of the aftercited indecent doctrines located in the ultimate period of the required textbook:
Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you procure fashion a 1000-1500 expression reply in which you dissequence EACH of the aftercited summits IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the doer's deep subject-matter? 2) How does he living his deep subject-matter (evidence, subservient subject-matters, etc.)? 3) Do you acquiesce or disacquiesce after a while him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at last two of the interpretings we keep idea-out in this sequence (in tenets 1-9) to your partition. Frame infallible to present a palpable exposition of how the philosophers' insights are applictalented to the subject-matter you are debateing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These doctrines are rather crave and multifarious. The doer likes to frame big use of his rather bounteous glossary, so I strongly impel you to keep dictionary.com expert as you exertion your way through your chosen period. The end of this essay assignment is for you to prove your power to debate, awaken, and evaluate multifarious philosophic subject-matters. I am bold that the interpreting assignments, tests, and debateion boards procure keep apt you for this ultimate, and no vacillate challenging, essay assignment.
Note: I simply recognize one attack on this assignment. Students who do not easily dissequence all of the components of the assignment as formal in the instructions as polite as the grading rubric underneath procure keep to be resigned after a while the gradation they earned.
Please use MLA frameat.
Your pamphlet procure be gradationd according to the aftercited rubric:
The aftercited standards are numbered in dispose of signification for grading.
1.Essay proves an intelligence of the material: The ward has well grasped a wise height or interrogation, has explained it precisely, and on the premise of a in-effect improve sense of any texts compromised. Key provisions are used well. The essay shows sign of the ward's independent idea, and is written in his or her distinguished opinion. Short (one doom) extracts are used (comprising no past than 10% of the substantiality of the pamphlet), when embezzle, to living the transcriber's partition, and an exposition is offered for each extract. The use of arrest extracts procure fruit in a violent summit conclusion.
2.Essay has apparent and close subject-matter: There is a apparently formal disquisition, and living for this disquisition in the substantiality of the pamphlet. Each chapter contributes to this subject-matter, and follows logically from the chapter precedently it. The subject-matter presented is modest. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated into the partition.
3.Essay fulfills assigned task: The essay discoursees the full assigned interrogation or subject-matter, elaborating on material ideas in grateful profundity, but after a whileout bringing in anything ascititious or impertinent. The vestibule of the essay focuses and provides clarity for the pamphlet. Material provisions are apparently and precisely defined. Each chapter conveys a close, systematic idea. Short (one doom) extracts are casually used, when embezzle, to living the transcriber's partition, and an exposition is offered for each extract. No past than 10% of pamphlet is made up of plain quotes. No arrest extracts.
4.Essay obeys standards for amiable modest letter: the transcriber shows that he or she is comforttalented using wise diction, and the prose is apparent, not maladroit. The texture of the dooms reflects the relationships between/among the ideas debateed.
5.Essay is technically improve: The essay has been careeasily and ideaeasily proofread. The subject-matter is written in entire dooms, after a while punctuation that does not mismanage the interpreter. There are no mistakes in spelling, language, expression exquisite, and punctuation.