This Nursing essay delineations the consequence of iconicity and hubris in the tenor of new tissue. Momentous applications of the marvel composerized as Starchitects and their gift to enunciateing a new adjudication of tprogeny are tendered in this examine. The deep concrete of the examine is to sift-canvass the scarcitys of iconic edifices constituted by Starchitects, by nucleusing on sundry exhibitions including chary and gregarious, gregarious and questionive, and environmental and evolutionary. In classify to confront these learning concretes, the learninger uses non-tentative learning way in the hypothesis of collecting applicable notification from unascititious instrument. The most ascititious misentry tendered in the examine is that iconic edifices are perceived as egocentric reproduce-exhibitations of the awry assumed ambitions of Starchitects.
Chapter 1: Introduction
In the 21st date, global enunciateers accept demonstrated their influential readiness to use the immanent of Starchitects in classify to constitute relical edifices. The boom of Starchitects in newity can be explained behind a while the quick rule of globalisation as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as economic advance and fruit (Marshall, 2000). Designs of such builders are usually perceived as iconic dominated by spacious view and singular characteristics that subscribe to the request of these edifices. It has been argued that the use of Starchitects is an innovative way to extend tourism in incongruous sites abutting the universe. The cunning of prestige edifices environing the universe has been noticeable by the undesigning end to fetch-about a discord in submissive favoring landmarks for cities (King, 1990). The motives for the whole of purpose landmarks unite to the favoringity of Starchitects who are a emanation of their sponsors and organisations, which actively inquire to tender spontaneous alteration in the builderural arena. Incongruous fruits of iconic edifices can be rest globally, such as the Imperial War Museum North (2002) domiciled in Elder Manchester, UK, and the Seattle Central Library (2004) domiciled in Washington, US. Aapprove edifices accept been very-much criticised since the era of their reading. This implies the life of controversies exclusive some of the most illustrious edifices environing the universe especially at new eras.
Perceived as an exhibition, newity can coalesce behind a while transmitted builderural patterns. Modernity is deeply unquiet behind a while transmutation of the tender and tries to individualize such an exhibition in emblematic edifices. New builderural patterns as palpable in the pieces constituted by Starchitects appliance the ending in composite symbolicals and composite structural technology (Marshall, 2000). Accordingly, the enlargement of the cities has generated the wants for the disconnection of all the talents that elucidate a enunciateing civilisation, allowing them to inquire out convertibility in the infrastructural instrument that are rest behind a whilein them and their cleverness to divulge behind a while others and retender themselves in intergregarious entrepreneurial questions (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009). While the fruit of the builderural landmarks constitutes the possibility of increasing the tourism adduction to the sites, expositions and events are compulsory to eminentbright and approvenesspredicament these fruits thus creating a instrument of boarding for the themeal composerities and strange investors.
The deep aim of the examine is to cater a applicable brains of the exhibitions of iconicity and hubris as applied to the performance of Starchitects. The subjoined concretes accept been delineationd for the examine:
To delineation the economic and gregarious scarcitys of iconic edifices;
To sift-canvass the collision of gregarious and questionive scarcitys of iconic edifices;
To tender environmental (modish & spontaneous) scarcitys of iconic edifices;
To sift-canvass the junction of evolutionary perspectives
Chapter 1 is initiative and sets the tenor for the tender examine. Paragraph 2 is the lore revisal providing bland notification relative-to to the sift-canvassd theme in the symbolical. Paragraph 3 delineations the learning wayology used in the examine. Paragraph 4 consists of learning counter-arguments, sift-canvassion and segregateition of counter-arguments. Paragraph 5 concludes the examine and caters favoring advices pertaining to the deep learning interrogations and concretes.
Chapter 2: Lore Review
Three ascititious symbolical question victualss composerized in this symbolical are Starchitects, iconicity and hubris. A Stbuilder is relatered to as an builder who is wholly illustrious as a messageination of the eminent-profile myths life tendered by him or her to the open (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009). Iconicity is a message relative-to to the favoring characteristics of an icon or colossus emblematic in the tenor of tprogeny (Glendinning, 2012). Hubris marks a eminent plane of self-assurance and thus is composerized as spacious vainglory or self-assertion.
In a bulk by Glendinning (2012), the nucleus is on the pitfalls of global newism demonstrated in the myth of sundry builderural edifices globally. The deep deduceing introduced by the learninger is that tprogeny has been right spectacularised, which has led to estranged builderural pieces and men-folks. It has been compromised that the so-called iconic edifices accept irpertinent gregarious and literal single-mindedness, importing that the exhibition of iconicity has been replaced by carelessness that approvenesss irpertinent composerized builderural concretes (Jacobs, 1961). The approveness of iconic edifices constituted by illustrious Starchitects has extended rigorousure in new years, as delineationd by Glendinning (2012). These edifices accept been tendered as competing for care on the skyline and in the heap instrument. Similarly, Sudjic (2005) marks doubts in the genuineness and unexceptionably adapted end of iconic edifices.
Moreover, learningers accept considered iconicity as a contrariant approveness of builderural tourism, which animadverts in edifices adapted for modish migration destinations (Specht, 2014). Kent (2010) implies that tissue’s setation has been radical from iconic to peculiar in the rule of exploring builderural edifices’ movables on a hypothesis of settle. Such a hypothesis has been sift-canvassd by Rybczynski (2008) behind a while a nucleus on the Bilbao movables or the Bilbao abnormity reproduce-exhibiting a high-priced iconic scarcity. The Bilbao movables, as approvenessn in an planation by Martin (2013), constitutes controversies and thus the learninger tenders a admonition about the perceived privative collision of Starchitects’ iconic edifices on themeal cities and avers.
Iconic tprogeny has been composerized as a bulkive scarcity, as argued in an planation by Romaniuk (2010). The composer of the learning has tendered convincing deduceings relative-to to the production of the heap instrument enigmatical to constitute a expedient desire of iconic tissue. Such production is palpable in emotionally full builderural plans including the Freedom Tower for Ground Zero (Romaniuk, 2010). It has been argued that the refuse of permission and the spacious enlargement of pluralism accept led to the emergence of iconic edifices that are unable to complete the concretes of real iconography (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009). In enumeration, the legitimacy of identifying purpose edifices as iconic can be judged behind a while era, careclose the heap instrument’s contemplated implications of auspicious builderural edifices singly domiciled on sociological and financial profitability. Domiciled on the deep studies tendered in the lore revisal, it can be concluded that edifices should be eternally assessed in victualss of the values behind a while which they are associated.
Chapter 3: Learning Methodology
The approveness of learning wayology used in this examine is non-tentative learning cunning, which is homogeneous to sift-canvass the conformity inchoate iconicity and hubris. Arguments are domiciled on sign and trustworthy hypothesis caterd in unascititious instrument (Yanow and Schwartz-Shea, 2006). The deep exhibition relative-to to non-tentative learning is the nucleus on grounds previously collected by learningers in the arena of tprogeny rather than bunch a new set of grounds. This learning frameperformance is constantly associated behind a while the ends of humanities and spontaneous philosophy. One of the most ascititious talents of this approveness of learning wayology, as applied in the tender examine, is revisal of tangible lore as the nucleus is to cater qualified deduceings in classify to shape the previously recurrent learning concretes (MacNealy, 1998). The immanent revisal of tangible lore on the symbolical implies not barely earlier avowal and bland learning skills but to-boot force to use a contrariant devise of meta-partition in an attack to thrust misentrys which are ascititious for the examine.
It has been distinguished that non-tentative learning segregateition suggests a momentous aggregate of varying explications of the notification obtained from unascititious instrument. A influential hypothesis of questionive search is ascititious in this approveness of learning consequently the rule of acquiring avowal is shapeed through sufficient delicate and analytical explications of the learning symbolical (MacNealy, 1998). In deed, it is ascititious to emphasise on the reexplication of indistinct notification on the childrens of iconicity and hubris behind a whilein the new frameperformance tendered in this examine. Thus, delicate animadverting is segregate of non-tentative learning segregateition, which is demonstrated in the tender learning. There is a weighty nucleus on propositions for hypothesis relative-to to the iconic work of new edifices abutting the universe (Yanow and Schwartz-Shea, 2006). The fruit of a purpose alikeity to the tender examine is a courteous-mannered-behaved-structured rule that rouses behind a while the identification of a focal children, in purpose the scrutiny of iconicity and hubris including their collision on the discernment of emblematic edifices constituted by Starchitects.
Once the foremost tread delineationd in the learning alikeity is completed, it is ascititious to change into a tendency of identifying key forces contributing to a amend explication of the learning tenor. The learninger is expected to assume such driving forces as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as to tender the deedors that accept been considered the most momentous for the quantity of the learning (Deleeuw et al., 2010). In enumeration, it is anticipated that systemic logic should be used to tender delicately the deep deduceings obtained from unascititious instrument. The enunciateed tread of the tendered learning alikeity is to succumb the perfect learning to delicate subsidy (Yanow and Schwartz-Shea, 2006). It can be concluded that the wages of non-tentative avowal can arrange the rule of obtaining applicable notification, which would prelate extend the learning to a new rank in the hypothesis of providing an bland repartee and explication to the learning interrogation.
Chapter 4: Learning Findings & Reasoning and Partition of Findings
The deep learning counter-arguments obtained from the delicate evaluation of unascititious instrument are grouped in incongruous subsections of this paragraph in classify to nucleus on emerging exhibitions relative-to to iconicity and hubris in a further plain deportment.
Economical and Gregarious Instances/ Cases of Failure
A momentous learning counter-argument demonstrated in this examine is that of the collision of creating iconic edifices on the husbanding. Favoring predicaments indicating hubris relate to Calatrava and Valencia, as Valencia has been recognised as a city of arts and sciences. Starchitects’ hypothesis of hubris is palpable in these predicaments and follows to approveness that tprogeny has entered a new adjudication of fruit. Although ploud by some and unusual by others, the emblematic edifices constituted by Starchitects import a bulkive aggregate of efforts invested in tendering the philosophy of iconicity in tprogeny (Glendinning, 2012). According to Martin (2013), the gap of the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao serves as a applicable fruit of how iconicity has been used as a bulkive indicator to mete the plain collision on the husbanding. It can be suggested that the myth of iconic edifices environing the universe, such as in locations in Saudi Arabia, Australia, Albania and Brazil, has loud the interrogation of the perceived economic movables of aapprove activities (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009). The extent of interchangeableisation cannot be neglected, as the uncombined motivating deedor aback the so-called iconicity and hubris can be rest in the end of generating bulkive avail from builderural tourism, which is dominated by emblematic edifice. Another ascititious exhibition can be to-boot compromised in victualss of concerning Starchitects’ cunning to stuff desolate spaces, but this tends to constitute a privative movables unordered some men-folks.
According to learningers, the horank of intergregarious mega events is one of the most masterful utensils that a city can use for approveness-casting of instrument and fruit, as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as the fruit of builderural identities that accept follow to be elucidated behind a whilein the activity as ‘destination copys’ (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009). In this tenor, favoring synchronous events accept follow to be identical behind a while interchangeable counteragency inchoate cities as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as the transnational environment, as incongruous climes contest to fascinate further investors and consumer spending. In bright of this, behind a while the acception in urgency for the cities to extend their entrepreneurial copy as they aim at increasing their adduction to movable principal, the cities accept to fetch-about subsidys on their boardings. It would be close chary for them to heave out fruit if they are not going to realise monetary fetch-about behind the renovations. Influential race is new-fangled behind a whilein most of today’s cities-the race life unorderedst the city investors themselves as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved behind a while other cities that may desire to assemblage incongruous events and expositions that are aimed at increasing the economic courteous-mannered-behavedlife of the clime. For this deduce, the quantity of iconic edifices by Starchitects has acceptiond from the climeal and themeal scenes, stemming into intergregarious and global flakes and requiring the integration of the gregarious, gregarious and infrastructural frontiers (Glendinning, 2012). Accordingly, the enlargement of the cities has generated the wants for the disconnection of all the talents that elucidate a enunciateing civilisation, allowing them to inquire out convertibility in the infrastructural instrument that are rest behind a whilein them and their cleverness to divulge behind a while others and retender themselves in intergregarious entrepreneurial questions (Martin, 2013). While the fruit of the builderural landmarks constitutes the possibility of increasing the tourism adduction to the sites, expositions and events are compulsory to eminentbright and approvenesspredicament these fruits thus creating a instrument of boarding for the themeal composerities and strange investors.
For the most segregate, the unaffected closeness of a amiable clear or a divine relic behind a whilein a city cannot be abundance for the new city. In classify to fetch-about avowal as a new city of the 21st date, a great portfolio of builderural fruit plans is compulsory so acception the output, aesthetics and open request of the city to the following a whileout universe, as it is picturesque in the predicament of iconic edifices (Glendinning, 2012). The portfolio involves sundry strategies that are used by the themeal fruit councils in increasing the builderural instrument rest behind a whilein the antecedent as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as the input by multinational organisations behind a whilein this fruit in lieu of the rules that are used by Starchitects. As enlargement is familiar in today’s cities, men-folks can corroborator how aapprove cunning applianceations are used in incongruous cities, behind a while transmutations of the new-fangled tissues agreeable to in the prodesire of excellence and convertibility (Marshall, 2000). The conclusive two decades accept seen the run of the ‘megacity’ marvel, behind a while feeble flake and constantly ‘off the grid’ cities life uplifted to city stardom through the regeneration of new-fangled tissues and the inclusion of socio-cultural events environing the myth of these instrument. As global cities enunciate, cultural and communal events accept been newfangled to these venues creating a hypothesis of view for their life and a want for their amendment.
Another counter-argument that emerged from the learning is that iconic edifices are perceived as a masterful utensil to reelucidate the chary and gregarious copy of cities and countries in which they are assumed (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009). The economic collision of these edifices has been spaciously considered in classify to tender bland misentrys about the aver of climeal economies. It cannot be spoiled that the closeness of vaporous iconic edifices in incongruous locations abutting the universe has improved the economic courteous-mannered-behaved-life of residents. Domiciled on the messageinations obtained from influenceing non-tentative learning, it can be argued that there are twain predicaments of chary and gregarious successes and scarcitys associated behind a while the reading of iconic edifices. This counter-argument is developed in a learning by Reutskaja and Nueno (2009) who cater sign of the confident collision on usurpation in the clime due to the emergence of iconic edifices and the ascititious part of hubris resistant to them. The reading of such edifices is plainly linked behind a while the myth of a bulkive calculate of jobs in incongruous countries as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as elder gift to the themeal council budgets in victualss of taxes and duties. Another confident economic collision is akin to enumerational usurpation in manufacturing rulees for organisations that are imperative for the reading of iconic edifices. However, the privative economic movabclose of the subordinatestanding of emblematic edifices should not be ignored (Rybczynski, 2008). For entreaty, a momentous economic disfavor is associated behind a while the eminenter fees that are usually full by Starchitects, indicating their egocentric deedors of motivation used in the reading of aapprove edifices. A subsidy of the challenges of absorb estimations and over-budgeting should be considered in classify to individualize the definite chary and gregarious collision of iconic edifices.
Social & Subjective Instances/ Cases of Failure
The reproduce-exhibitation of iconic edifices has been to-boot linked behind a while favoring gregarious and questionive implications. There are spacious fruits that mark hubris of the compromised Starchitects. These are Zaha Hadid’s Qatar Stadium and Patrik Schumacher’s rhodomontade at 2014 tprogeny biennale. It appears that the mentioned edifices heave out the ‘pride’ of their creators in victualss of compromised efforts to fetch-about a conclusiveing percussion on the open. Moreover, it has been discovered that the exhibition of open aberration is unordered the deep deedors contributing to the increasing gregarious and questionive entreatys of failed iconic edifices. Starchitects accept been composerized as losing their request consequently they accept accordingly united to the philosophy of constructing builderural edifices of redundancy (Glendinning, 2012). As a messageination, it constantly appears that builderural cunning of undoubtful edifices environing the universe is dominated by redundancyive talents, which constitute an irapplicable discernment unordered mob. The tender examine to-boot compromised that tprogeny is in a new era of fruit in the hypothesis of nucleussing on the possibilities that technology has to tender. Yet, this raises the interrogation whether such new tprogeny succeeds in serving the wants of man (Kent, 2010). The repartee to this interrogation is intricate concerning the multiple movabclose constituted by the favoring line or adjudication of tprogeny followed by Starchitects. However, it can be recurrent that tprogeny right emerges as an art that cannot be avoided by any instrument.
An questionive incopy of failed iconic edifices is akin to the purity and contention of such pieces of new tissue. For fruit, Patrik Schumacher was prisoner of life motivated by an exhibition composerized as ‘misguided gregarious correctness’. It has been argued that builders should try their best not to disorganize tprogeny and art. A applicable counter-argument inspired in this tenor is that tprogeny is in-effect rest in inculpate of the favoring devise of the built environment (Glendinning, 2012). It is ascititious to emphasise that one of the deep duties of builders in synchronous company is to transmit a influential exhibition of gregarious right. However, it should be compromised that Starchitects’ performances accept loud a command of questionive and purposel concerns (Martin, 2013). In Qatar, migrhodomontade performanceers died at a stadium which is currently subordinate reading, as this intensifies gregarious carefulness and timidity relative-to to the end and instrument utilised by Starchitects in their egocentric reproduce-exhibitations rest in new edifices. It has been claimed that builders are not imperative for the release of these migrhodomontade performanceers, but the interrogation of the purposel and questionive parameters of such iconic edifices peaceful scum permanent in the minds of men-folks.
Environmental and Evolutionary Instances/ Cases of Scarcity & Evolutionary Perspectives
The children of sift-canvassing Starchitects’ hubris animadverts in vaporous fruits, such as Lloyds edifice and Calatrava & Valencia. The deep exhibition that was inspired in the examine from an environmental perspective is that of the myth of insufficient masterpieces of tissue. It can be argued that such builderural myths accept been messageinationed of the over-ambition of Starchitects (Glendinning, 2012). The fruit of Lloyd’s of London as anticipating leaving its iconic headquarters palpably illustrates the arrogance of environmental scarcity. In deed, it has been compromised that the deep tenor behind a while this edifice is its inhospitableness to the talents making it an exceedingly high-priced constitution (Martin, 2013). Cases of scarcity approve this one purpose out that the technological advances of new tprogeny accept outpaced the undesigning force of Starchitects to adeptly utilise them. The scarcity of emblematic edifices to confront rigorous negotiative requirements is momentous of their irpertinent environmental collision. Another fruit of a failed iconic edifice, as seen through the environmental lens, is seen at Calatrava’s City of Arts and Sciences intricate in Valencia. Barely eight years behind the quantity of this plan, undoubtful segregates of the reading rouseed devolution off. Such an incopy of builderural scarcity confirms deep counter-arguments delineationd in the lore revisal individuality concerning the scarcitys of synchronous iconic edifices (Reutskaja and Nueno, 2009; Romaniuk, 2010).
The learning counter-arguments compromised that twain builders and enunciateers are spaciously nucleussed on erecting icons, but the messageinations constantly adapt out in a privative tendency. The ambitions of Starchitects seemed to accept subscribed to the emergence of unconducively deeptained pieces of tprogeny in newity (Romaniuk, 2010). In this hypothesis, it can be argued that the builderural tprogeny is unimpairedly neglected by Starchitects. Yet, a deep tenor constituted behind a while iconic edifices is that they constantly product one-lined repartee, which has befollow rather tenoratic for the perfect capacitying of the cities where these edifices are situated. Assessing the environmental collision of iconic edifices is a intricate rule relative-to to the interrelations of deedors such as settle, capacity and fact (Rybczynski, 2008). Domiciled on the learning counter-arguments delineationd in this examine, it is ascititious to aver that iconic edifices accept unimpairedly radical their setation in the hypothesis that mob further and further rouse resigning the end of iconicity resistant to aapprove pieces of new tissue. The privative environmental collision of emblematic edifices cannot be ignored in the sift-canvassion of the ambitions of Starchitects and how those ambitions animadvert in the edifices assumed by them. Changing the setation of Starchitects’ edifices from iconic to peculiar one is momentous of the way the open has altered its discernments concerning the gifts of new-day builders.
Chapter 5: Misentry and Recommendations
This Nursing essay sift-canvassd the implications of iconicity and hubris relative-to to builderural pieces constituted by Starchitects. Vaporous exhibitions associated behind a while this children accept been entirely investigated to involve incongruous perspectives and entreatys of hubris, such as chary and gregarious entreatys of scarcity, gregarious and questionive entreatys as courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved as environmental entreatys of how the concept of iconicity in new tprogeny has been unfortunate. It has been concluded that these builderural myths are unaffectedly charyly and gregariously disruptive egocentric reproduce-exhibitations of the irapplicable ambitions manifested by Starchitects. The examine picturesque how these emblematic readings built by Starchitects accept tendered deep scarcitys behind a while long-message gregarious and questionive implications (Glendinning, 2012). As a messageination, it was demonstrated that the myths of Starchitects cannot be perceived anyfurther as iconic, as the exhibition of iconicity has been simport replaced by so-called peculiar work of perceiving aapprove edifices (Martin, 2013).
The learning way used in this examine relatered to the frameperformance of non-tentative learning segregateition, which has been rest homogeneous to confront the examine’s deep aim and concretes. This approveness of way known for elder flexibility in exploring favoring concepts akin to the collision of iconicity and hubris on the fruit of new tprogeny (Sudjic, 2005). Moreover, the examine composerized that tprogeny has entered into a new rank of fruit behind a while twain confident and privative exhibitions that should be sift-canvassed entirely to subordinatestand the favoring collision of Starchitects’ ambitions (Glendinning, 2012).
However, undoubtful retentions can be composerized for the tender examine. The deep retention relates to the use of non-tentative learning way. Instead, the learninger could accept utilised tentative learning way that could accept subscribed to achieving elder exactness and reliforce of learning counter-arguments (MacNealy, 1998). Another retention relates to the favoring lore that has been selected for obtaining messageinations. Broader lore could accept been used to screen the deep deduceings picturesque in the examine (Yanow and Schwartz-Shea, 2010).
In victualss of advices, it is ascititious to voicelessness that the sift-canvassd symbolical is wholly intricate and thus requires the applianceation of multiple perspectives to brains the spacious accoutre of collisions relative-to to the builderural performances of Starchitects. Thus, it is recommended to influence an in-depth pristine learning involving new builders from incongruous countries, as they can cater insightful suggestions concerning the fruit of a new era in tprogeny (Glendinning, 2012). This advice to-boot marks a weighty nucleus on including suggestions for advenient learning in the arena in classify to fetch the theme of iconicity and hubris of builderural edifices to new horizons of learning scrutiny (Martin, 2013). A immanent symbolical that may be investigated in a advenient learning relates to mob’s hypothesis on the collision of iconic edifices for the long-message fruit of their cities.
Deleeuw, J., Meijer, E. and Goldstein, H., eds. (2010). Handbulk of Multiplane Analysis. Santa Monica, CA: Springer.
Glendinning, M. (2012). Architecture’s Evil EmpireThe Triumph and Tragedy of Global Modernism. London: Reaktion Books.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Release and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Kent, F. (2010). Toward an Tprogeny of Place: Moving over Iconic to Extraordinary. Plan for Open Spaces [online]. Available at: http://www.pps.org/reference/toward-an-architecture-of-place-moving-beyond-iconic-to-extraordinary/ [Accessed on: 18 Oct. 2014].
King, A. D. (1990). ‘Architecture, Principal and the Globalization of Culture’. Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 7, pp. 397-411.
MacNealy, M. S. (1998). Strategies for Tentative Learning in Writing. London: Longman.
Marshall, R. (2000). Emerging Urbanity: Global Modish Projects in the Asia Pacific Rim. London: Spon Press.
Martin, J. (2013). The Bilbao Effect: If You Build It, Will They ComeThe Economist [online]. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/21591708/comments [Accessed on: 18 Oct. 2014].
Reutskaja, E. and Nueno, J. L. (2009). ‘Starchitects, Emblematic Buildings and Their Proceeds on Modish Economics’. IESE Business School, University of Navarra, pp. 1-20.
Romaniuk, O. (2010). Scarcity of Iconic Architecture. Living Space [online]. Available at: http://www.livingspace360.com/index.php/failure-of-iconic-architecture-12484/ [Accessed on: 18 Oct. 2014].
Rybczynski, W. (2008). When Buildings Try Too Hard. The Wall Street Journal [online]. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB122731149503149341 [Accessed on: 18 Oct. 2014].
Specht, J. (2014). Architectural Tourism: Edifice for Modish Migration Destinations. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Sudjic, D. (2005). Can We Peaceful Believe in Iconic BuildingsProspect Magazine [online]. Available at: http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ [Accessed on: 18 Oct. 2014].
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P., eds. (2006). Explication and Method: Tentative Learning Methods and the Interpretive Turn. New York: M. E. Sharpe.