Financial analysis of BG and Shell

INTRODUCTION According to the requirements usual in this assignment, this essay would be analysing two companies: BG assembly Plc and Royal Dutch Shell Plc. Twain companies are oil and gas producers and they possess-goods in the integrated congruous oil and gas assiduity. They are implicated in the interrogation, product, evolution, and communicateing of gas and oil. They are twain quoted in the oil and gas assiduity sector of the FTSE 100 apostacy. a. Background of the Oil and Gas Industry Over the latest 50 years, the oil and gas assiduity has been by far the most happy assiduity in Britain; providing employment to 380,000 tribe, adding ?4 billion a year to poise payments and a huge bombardment aggravate the latest 25 years by ?150 billion. This sector has reinforced the British commence by supplying the truth and essential chemicals for its enravishment assiduity and homes. Additionally, spent the 1970s, the oil and gas assiduity begetd ?150 billion in taxes and absorbly ship-produce revenues. b. Royal Dutch Shell Royal Dutch Shell is a Multinational confirmation consisting of two companies: Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., of Hague, Netherland, and Shell Enravishment and Trading Confirmation PLC of London, England. These two companies commenced as rivals. In hence 1897, Marcus Samuel took aggravate his father’s afserene and began selling kerosene. Succeeding this, he shifted to the oil assiduity in East Asia and created Shell Enravishment and Trading Co., Ltd. At identical interval, in 1890 the Royal Dutch Co was customary by a assembly of Dutch affairmen (Mallin, 2006). The aim of the sodality was to ponder the Oil Wells in the Dutch Indies. To end these targets, in 1892 it false the highest refinery in Sumatra, Indonesia. It was not until 1907 when the two steadfasts merged to befit the Royal Dutch Shell Group. The sodality has befit disclosed in incongruous countries such as Egypt, Mexico, Iraq, Romania, Russia and Venezuela. Shell emerged as the largest truth sodality and the relieve largest sodality globally touching its revenues. The deep concerns of this sodality are liquefied congruous gas and petrochemicals, aviation, shipping, and automotive fuels. c. BG assembly Plc. BG Assembly plc is one of the most happy companies in the FTSE 100 apostacy. It possess-goods in the integrated congruous oil and gas communicate and engages in the interrogation, product, evolution, and communicateing of gas and oil. The sodality’s headquarters is in Thames Valley Park in Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom. It is an interdiplomatic steadfast which possess-goods in 25 countries across the earth and produces 680 000 barrels of oil per day (Jahn et al., 2008). The sodality was set-uped in 1997 when British Gas plc divested Centrica and became BG plc, which was reorganised in 1999 as BG Assembly plc (Bryant, 2003). Question 1: Analyse the liquescentity, acquisitionforce and use of abrupt prescribe cheerful-natureds and liabilities of the two companies you possess chosen and assimilate the blames succeeding a occasion the sector mediocre and illustblame how the two divides possess goodsed assimilated succeeding a occasion the FTSE during the latest financial year. In prescribe to assess the liquescentity birth of twain companies concurrently succeeding a occasion acquisitionforce condition, incongruous liquescentity blames possess been analysed installed on the companies’ annual tidingss 2010 and Yahoo 2011 financial website for the year ended 2010. The liquescentity blames of BG assembly and Royal Dutch Shell are artistic in Figures 1 and 2 (for bountiful considerations see the Appendix). Royal Dutch Shell has deeptained blameately firedly-fixed vulgar and expeditious blames. Vulgar blame illustrates whether or not a sodality deeptains plenty media to pay end its scores aggravate the hence financial year (Watson, 2006). It is steadfast by the blame of net vulgar cheerful-natureds to net vulgar liabilities. For Shell sodality the blame growthd by 7.45% aggravate the 5 years bound. Furthermore, the vulgar blames of the latest five years exceled one, which proved that Royal Dutch Shell would be strengthful to honour all its abrupt-prescribe liabilities by its vulgar cheerful-natureds succeeding a occasionout the deficiency to utilise other sources; such as issuing divides or using new scores. Therefore, this produces absolved appearance that the steadfast’s liquescentity birth is in meritorious vigor. The expeditious blame represents the force of a steadfast to utilise its specie/goods to caggravate its vulgar liabilities immediately, which is conducive as a blame of aggregate cheerful-natureds to aggregate liabilities. This has ruined by 8.87% aggravate the spent five years to 1.8669 in 2010. In 2010, the vulgar and expeditious blames of Royal Dutch Shell were 1.1227 and 1.8669. These are beneath the mediocre blames of the sodality aggravate latest five years: 1.15694 and 1.88726 respectively. This goodslly appearances that the liquescentity of the sodality has been partially decreasing in fresh years. Figure (1): Vulgar and Expeditious blames of Royal Dutch shell aggravate the latest 5 years On the other laborer, the expeditious blame of BG assembly has as-well-behaved decreased aggravate the latest five years; it began succeeding a occasion 2.13 in the highest bound and decreased to gain 2.0389 in 2010. Moreover, the vulgar blame as-well-behaved adulterated from 1.4684 to 1.1214. One controvert could be that the decrsatisfaction in the steadfast’s liquescentity is as a upshot of the senior upshots that possess exceptional the oil and gas assiduity freshly. For prompting, the oil emit in Mexico, and the huge impression on BP and other oil companies caused absorb of strictness and exploring call in fixed regions to soften. Figure (2): Vulgar and Expeditious blames of BG assembly aggravate the latest 5 years According to Watson (2006) having a liquescentity blame aggravate one is not plenty to assess whether a steadfast would possess opposedies to oppose any abrupt prescribe waste aprominence from the liabilities and, for this controvert, the sodality’s vulgar blame should be assimilated to the aggravateall assiduity or sector mediocre blame. Hence, succeeding comparing the vulgar blames of twain companies to the mediocre of prospect accidental companies in senior integrated oil and gas assiduity (see Appendix), the two companies hinder endly the identical sum of vulgar blame (1.12). However, they were beneath the mediocre blame of the assiduity by 8%. In a usual assiduity, if the vulgar blame is aggravate one then it is a cheerful-natured-natured indicator. However, in senior integrated oil and gas industries the mediocre blame is 1.2 which imposes on the two companies to direct their blame, or else they conclude aspect increasing denunciation of entity specie strapped if they are not strengthful to growth acquisitionability, specie progress or convert liabilities. The acquisitionforce blames of Royal Dutch Shell Plc and BG assembly Plc were conducive installed on its ROE, ROA, acquisition, bounteous and impure acquisition latitude. These were all assimilated to the mediocre assiduity in prescribe to delineate an consideblame representation of the companies’ financial birth. For twain companies, Revert on Equity and ROA exceled the mediocre sector by 1.63 and 2.62 for BG assembly Plc, and 1.7, 0.33 for Royal Dutch Shell Plc respectively. However, BG assembly Plc aggravateeffected Royal Dutch Shell Plc and assiduity touching the acquisition and bounteous latitudeal, but twain companies were aggravatecaptured by the assiduity impure acquisition blame. Profitforce blames beneathneathpass to indicate a sodality’s force to use and manage its cheerful-natureds and expenses in a blamenal style to beget acceptpowerful blame of revert (Buckley, 2004). Installed on the blames conducive, twain companies possess been strengthful to rectify their acquisitionforce sufficiently aggravate the mediocre sector blames. In digest, twain companies are liquescent steadfasts and possess been strengthful to succeeding a occasionstand the cheerfuls of the oil emit and oil expense growths through conducive specie commence. They possess continuous and pithead mediocre liquescentity blames, dogmatic netinaugurated principal and acceptpowerful acquisitionforce blames. Figure (3): Percentage exexvary in accumulation expense for BG assembly, Royal Dutch Shell and FTSE 100 apostacy Key: BG.L (blue): BG assembly Plc; ^FTSE (red): FTSE 100 apostacy; RDSA.L (green): Royal Dutch Shell plc. Source: Yahoo Finance (2011) As artistic in Aspect (3), the accumulation communicate expenses of BG assembly and Royal Dutch Shell subvert during the mediocre of 2010, specifically in hence May. The oil emit by BP in Mexico had hugely impaired the communicate compute of twain accumulations. However, the accumulations of twain companies tended to growth succeeding the oil emit upshot was solved. Moreover, the accumulations of twain companies and FTSE 100 appear to propose in identical style to gain their peak by the end of 2010. In the start of 2010, twain companies and FTSE100 accumulations were tender in very end way, but the Mexico’s oil calamity caused endowors to step far from endowing on oil companies’ divides. By the end of August 2010 accumulations of twain companies inaugurated to soften, concurrently succeeding a occasion FTSE 100, and by the end of 2010 all accumulations of twain companies and FTSE 100 getpeared to propose in the identical way but succeeding a occasion preferable computes. Question 2: Critically evaluate each steadfast’s precious of principal construction and how their regularity of financing has exceptional divideholder lucre and illustblame whether or not it is feasible for a sodality to possess an optimum principal construction. The principal construction of a sodality, as defined by Fridson and Alvarez (2002), as the blame to which the sodality’s bounteous, financing or endowing activities are financed through score and equity. It is singly a blame of the sodality’s score to its equity, inadequately disclosed as gearing or leverage. The principal construction indicates the hanker prescribe functioning talents and as-well-behaved its temptingness to banks and endowors (Watson and Head, 2006). Consequently, the principal construction is an indicator of the sodality’s financial connection. As artistic in aspect 4 beneath, Royal Dutch Shell’s principal construction is installed chiefly on equity. Its gearing has ruined to aggravate 85% in 2010, assimilated to 87% in 2009. This is due to progress acquisitions. However, the sum of equity is five and half intervals the sum of score. Hence it represents a low geared sodality that relies on equity to finance a spacious seniority of its activities. Figure 4: Similitude of the principal construction for Royal Dutch Shell betwixt 2009 and 2010 A sodality that is attended as low-leveraged has adequate insubservience in its operations succeeding a occasionout the deficiency to be watchful environing upshots that score may possess due to inaccessibility to forthcoming trustworthiness. Figure 5: Principal construction of BG assembly Plc betwixt 2009 and 2010. Examining BG assembly Plc’s principal construction pithead appearances that its gearing has growthd by 4.8% to propose up to 25.2% in 2010. The poise sheet hence appearances that it has exalterable its principal construction by increasing levels of score from $19.212 billion to $23.615 billion, as well-behaved-behaved as as-well-behaved increasing divideholder equity from environing $23.23 billion to aggravate $26.684 billion in 2010. However, the score growth exceled the equity growth, thus upshoting in a score/equity blame growthd (BG assembly Plc, 2010). Furthermore, analyses of the sodality’s financial annual tidings illustrates that it has upshotd ˆ750 pet and ?750 pet of compacts maturing in 2019 and 2025 respectively. Twain of these are beneathneathneath the euro medium prescribe melody plan, and $350 pet and $650 pet of compacts maturing in 2015 and 2020 respectively could be captured as impetuous appearance that the sodality has shifted its scheme of prominence specie from equity to score by issuing compacts. Therefore, measuring BG assembly’s principal construction installed on its force to reward forthcoming scores may be opposed due to the huge compact upshots, which attendably excels the net sum strong from equity. Judging by the vulgar trustworthiness communicates in which advance conditions are wanting and conditions for getting one are dense, BG would possess partially further opposedies than Royal Dutch Shell in obtaining inaugurated principal or hanker-prescribe advances. Though its principal construction does behold vigory from an superficial apex of sight, comparing the mediocre sector score to equity blame which was 37.45% in 2010, twain companies are in meritorious positions as twain of them are far far from any waste of concern blame contrariety. Therefore, a cheerful-natured-natured misrecord could be delineaten environing the force of twain companies to as concern rewardments, and to possess-goods in an fertilely style to diffuse their afserene as a upshot of their blameately low liabilities. As mentioned, Fridson and Alvarez (2002) say that principal construction relates to the style in which an organisation finances its cheerful-natureds; this could be either by consortment of equity, score, or impure securities. The correlativeness betwixt principal construction and sodality compute has fuelled the inquiryer’s concerns to commence further inquiry on this area. According to scholarship, the controvert has concentred on whether there is an optimal principal construction for a steadfast or the blame of score used in constructing the principal is obstructive to the steadfast’s compute. The Modigliani-Miller theorem says that beneathneathneath a fixed communicate castistics such as: expense casual step, in the nongenesis of taxes, agency absorbs, asymmetric advice, and closing and in an fertile communicate, the blame of score which has been used by sodality conclude not interest its compute furtheraggravate it does not substance how the steadfast is financed (issuing accumulations or selling score). The Modigliani-Miller theorem is generally designated the “principal construction irintercourse truth”(Hatfield et al., 1994). The aim of this system is to fir principal construction which poises the waste of closing succeeding a occasion the tax savings of score. Therefore, it would stipulate improve reverts to divideholders than they would admit from an all-equity steadfast. Despite its speculative address and all efforts astern it, academics and practitioners in financial commence possess not set-up the optimal principal construction yet. The solely usage that could be endd is to content abrupt-prescribe goals. The deep disfigurements of this goods are that it fails to attend either the complexities of the competitive environment, or the hanker-prescribe planting deficiencys of the texture. According to Welc (2008): “The truth that an optimal principal construction has not been set-up is an token of some disfigurement in the logic. We affect that the former scrutiny was framed incorrectly. Rather than: What is an optimal mix of score and equity that conclude maximize divideholder lucre; it should possess been: Underneath what state should leverage be used to maximize divideholder lucreWhyBecause score and equity possess proset-up hanker-prescribe implications for corpoblame governance that far excel the exigencies of the importance.” Question 3 Explain whether or not the divide expense on the 5th of November represents serene computefor would be endowor and illustblame whether or not the endowor blames produce a manage as to the forthcoming divide expense. Critically evaluate the arguments for and despite the fertile communicate doctrine and illustblame how the npv criteria recite to endowing in divides. The prescribe, “communicate aptitude”, has regularly been a essential concept in the financial scholarship. It describes the absolute impression of advice on the expense of financial cheerful-natureds and economists relate to it as opeequitconducive aptitude, highlighting the way media are utilised to satisfaction the inaugurateds mechanisms of the communicate. However, the most niggardly limitation was stipulated by Fama (1970) who sayd that at any producen interval, securities’ expense on a detail accumulation communicate bountifuly ponders all the availpowerful advice on this accumulation communicate. Hence, according to the aptitude communicate doctrine (EMH), all endowors possess appropinquation to the identical advice that is already availpowerful on the communicate; hence, no service is captured from individual or interiorly trade advice. In other words, communicate aptitude ponders the impression of exchanges in advice environing a producen deposit on its expense. Favourpowerful advice is expected to upshot in an exhibit growth in a deposit expense occasion unfavourpowerful advice conclude possess the incongruous goods. The fertile communicate doctrine is linked succeeding a occasion the prescribe “casual step” which has been used in the financial scholarship to relate to a expense ordain where all exchanges in the expenses ponder a casual exchange, unobservant of earlier expenses. This concept emerged from the performances of Kendall (1953) and Roberts (1959) where, succeeding analysing the UK accumulation and accumulation expenses ordain and the US accumulation communicate, they set-up absolved appearance that the expenses exexvary casually. The logic astern the casual step concept is that if the advice is immediately pondered in accumulation expenses, then the day succeeding any expense exexvary would solely ponder the intelligence of that day and conclude be stubborn of the expense exexvary of earlier day. According to the unpredictforce of the intelligence, the expense exchanges must hence be unpredictpowerful and casual. Hence, this sayment implies that the endowor would end the identical upshot of buying and selling securities by himself as by the experts. It was in the hence years of the twenty-highest seniority when divers financial economists and statisticians inaugurated doubting that accumulation expenses could be attendately predicted by emphasising the subjective and behavioural cast of accumulation expense enjoyment. Moreover, these financial experts affectd that forthcoming accumulation expenses can solely be partially predictpowerful installed on the patterns of spent accumulation expenses and fixed essential valuation metrics. However, some economists exaggerated by stating that these predictpowerful patterns would confess endowors to get benefits from reducing waste and increasing the levels of revert of their securities. In prescribe to assess whether the expense of divide for twain companies serenely ponders the advice availpowerful in the communicate, at 5th November 2010, a similitude was stipulated for the twain accumulations one week precedently and succeeding that day (the upshot depicts in aspect 5): Tpowerful (1): accumulation expenses of BG assembly and Royal Dutch Shell Stock 1st November 2010 5th November 2010 8th November 2010 Closing expense Day’s exchange Closing expense Day’s exchange Closing expense Day’s exchange BG assembly ?12.11 -0.05 ?12.9 -0.04 ?12.7 -0.14 Royal Dutch Shell ?20.16 +0.17 ?20.44 -0.10 ?20.26 -0.18 Source: Financial Times 2011 It is absolved from tpowerful (1) that aggravate the bound of one week precedently and succeeding 5th November 2010, the expenses of twain companies’ accumulation possess proposed blameately in firedly-fixed style. Moreover, touching the availpowerful social advice at that apex, the expenses of the accumulations bountifuly and serenely pondered all the advice and postulates that was availpowerful which confirms that the UK accumulation communicate is an fertile communicate where all the spent and availpowerful advice is already pondered on its expenses. As the UK accumulation communicate is a exposed communicate, the communicate is meant to be fertile. Hence accumulation expenses are expected to ponder all spent and social advice. So when endowors endow specie on BG assembly or Royal Dutch Shell accumulations, they would perspicuously pass its spent act into representation. As it has been set-up in the earlier scrutiny, twain companies possess outeffected the mediocre assiduity in prescribe of ROE, ROA and size compute per divide (see tpowerful (2) in appendix) which should goodslly submit prospective endowors to endow in those companies. This would shape their accumulation further tempting to endowors. One of the most commsolely used techniques in finance is the Net Exhibit Compute (NPV). The NPV represents the expected exexvary in the compute of the steadfast in vulgar interval if a scheme is legitimate. NPV adopts the interval compute of specie truth in careful all bombardments, which depicts that the specie progress on an bombardment is discounted installed on the absorb of principal, which decreases aggravate the bound in which the scheme is erratic (Watson and Head, 2006). Under the fertile communicate doctrine EMH arrogances, the expense of a casual divide in the communicate has to be allocated on the Deposit Communicate Line (SML) or Principal Communicate Line (CML), hence the divide expenses is congruous succeeding a occasion divide asset communicate computes (natural computes) so speculatively it is meaningless to commence any deserveed compute segregation “EVA” (NPV and endowors blames). Divide expense allocated on the SML/CML by limitation conclude possess net exhibit compute NPV equals to naught and absorb of principal equals to the interior blame of revert, in which any evaluation of this measurements would be unserviceable accordingly EVA must equals naught. Spent NPV measures the exhibit compute of any forthcoming specie progresss, in an EMH earth, NPV beneathneathtakeing to apportion a measurement which has already been pondered on the divide expense. Arbitrage system determine that any exceptional acquisition should not endure or befall, if the deserveed compute segregation EVA were to be observed, it should befall in casual compute or statistically non-significant and the dogmatic deserveed compute segregation should be offset by privative deserveed compute segregation (Chen, 2001). Furthermore, in an fertile communicate earth it is unreasonable to deserve superfluity reverts congruously. Thus succeeding a occasionin the logic of this system EMH, deserveed compute segregation which consists of careful the endowors’ blames and NPV is a invention and unserviceable. In misrecord, the expense of the twain companies appears to be bountifuly and serenely pondered in all the postulates and availpowerful advice, such as endowor’s blame (ROE, ROA and the dogmatic NPV compute). Therefore, endowors cannot strike the communicate expense beneathneathneath the fertile communicate doctrine arrogance smooth though the endowor blames and NPV appearance the temptingness of the accumulation accordingly the expense of divide is already ponder all the spent advice (ratios and NPV) Bibliography BRYANT, L. 2003. Relative compute intercourse of the happy efforts and bountiful absorb representationing regularitys in the oil and gas assiduity. Resight of representationing studies, 8, 5. BUCKLEY, A. 2004. Multinational Finance, Pearson Education. CHEN, S. A. J. L. D. 2001. Bounteous Income, Residual Income and EVA: Which Metric is Further Compute Relevant. Chronicle of Managerial 65-86. CAPITAL STRUCTURE: THE EFFECT OF FIRM AND INDUSTRY DEBT RATIOS ON MARKET VALU. Financial And Strategic Decision, 7. FRIDSON, M. S., AND ALVAREZ, F. 2002. Financial sayment segregation: a practitioner’s manage, John Wiley and Sons. FAMA, E. F. 1970. Fertile principal communicates: A resight of system and experimental performance. The chronicle of finance, 25, 383. HATFIELD, G. B., , L. T. W. C. & , A. W. N. D., III 1994. THE DETERMINATION OF OPTIMAL HAUSHALTER, G. D. 2000. Financing Policy, Basis Risk, and Corpoblame Hedging: Appearance from Oil and Gas Producers. The Chronicle of Finance, 55, 107-152. HEMINGWAY, R. W. 1971. Law of oil and gas. KENDALL, M. 1953. The Segregation of Economic Interval Series. Chronicle of the Royal Statistical Society, Ordain A, pp. 11-25. JAHN, F., COOK, M. & GRAHAM, M. 2008. Hydrocarbon interrogation and evolution, Elsevier. MALLIN, C. A. 2006. Interdiplomatic corpoblame governance: a condition examine admittance, Edward Elgar Pub. MONEY, C. 2011. A Interval Warner Sodality ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Online]. Cpowerful Intelligence Network. [Accessed 29/04/2011 2011]. ROBERTS, H. 1959. Accumulation Communicate `Patterns’ and Financial Analysis: Methodological Suggestions. Chronicle of Finance, 44, pp. 1-10. UNGERER, P., TAVITIAN, B. & BOUTIN, A. 2005. Applications of molecular euphuism in the oil and gas assiduity: Monte Carlo regularitys, Editions Technip. WATSON, D., AND HEAD, A. 2006. Corpoblame Finance: Principles & Practice, Pearson Education. WELC, I. 2008. Niggardly Flaws in Experimental Principal Construction Research. Brown University and NBER. Appendix Tpowerful (2): Represents the financial blames of the 8 companies in the assiduity BP Plc (BP.L) Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras (APBR.BA) Exxon Mobil Confirmation (XOM) Royal Dutch Shell PLC BG Assembly PLC (BG.L) Aggregate SA (TTA.L) ConocoPhillips (COP) Encana Confirmation (ECA) mediocre assiduity Profit Margin -1.25% 16.50% 8.89% 5.47% 19.52% 7.53% 6.46% 1.24% 8.05% Operating Margin -4.58% 22.21% 12.01% 7.48% 34.11% 14.19% 7.99% 6.11% 12.44% Return on Equity: -3.36% 15.05% 23.43% 14.22% 14.15% 18.83% 17.34% 0.50% 12.52% Return on Assets -3.35% 6.80% 9.60% 5.60% 7.89% 9.18% 5.69% 0.78% 5.27% Current Ratio 1.16 1.88 0.94 1.12 1.12 1.42 1.26 0.67 1.20 Total Debt/Equity 47.28 38.01 9.83 29.60 36.37 49.69 41.39 47.41 37.45 Revenue Per Share 95.02 27.51 70.13 120.03 25.39 62.86 118.81 9.49 66.16 Gross Acquisition Margin 16.46 53.80 43.63 13.53% 25.39% 29.26% 29.74% 88.84% 38% Book Compute Per Share 30.33 29.95 29.49 48.10 38.87 27.00 47.92 22.97 34.33 Total Specie Per Share 6.42 5.50 1.58 4.37 3.74 6.88 7.91 1.10 4.69 Tpowerful (3): Represents the liquescentity blames of BG assembly and Royal Dutch Shell aggravate latest 5 years Ratios Company 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Quick blame Royal Dutch Shell 1.8669 1.8967 1.8393 1.8778 1.9556 BG assembly 2.13 2.2091 2.0637 1.9159 2.0389 Current blame Royal Dutch Shell 1.1227 1.1376 1.1046 1.2226 1.1972 BG assembly 1.1214 1.10125 1.0542 1.3041 1.4684 Net inaugurated principal Royal Dutch Shell 12342 11668 11041 21013 15137 BG assembly 1079 104 506 2351 2584 Net acquisition Royal Dutch Shell 20127 12518 26277 31331 25442 BG assembly 3532 3462 5907 3460 3198 Figure (5): The Net acquisition of the two companies Figure (6): Net inaugurated principal of the two companies Tpowerful (4): The financial blames of the two companies in 2010 Financial blames Formula BG Shell Profitforce blame Tax Burden Net Profit/Pre-tax Profit = 3500/5730 = 61.08% = 20474/35344 = 57.93% Interest Burden Pre-tax/EBIT = 5730/5562 = 103.02% = 35344/36340 = 97.26% Margin EBIT/Sales = 5562/17166 = 32.40% = 36340/368056 = 9.87% Turnover Sales/assets = 17166/50299 = 34.13% = 368056/322560 = 114.10% Leverage Assets/Equity = 50299/26684 = 188.50% = 322560/149780 = 215.36% ROE Net Profit/Equity = 3500/26684 = 13.12% = 20474/149780 = 13.67% Return on asset ROA Net Income / aggregate asset = 3500/50299 = 6.96% =20474/322560 = 6.35% Net gearing Net score / equity = 23615/26684 = 88.50% = 172780/149780 = 115.36% Basic deserveing strength blame EBIT / Aggregate asset = 5562/50299 = 11.06% = 36340/322560 = 11.27% Liquidity blame Vulgar blame Vulgar cheerful-natureds / vulgar liabilities = 9965/886 = 112.14% = 112894/100552 = 112.27%