Need this week 4 discussion done by 26

  In novel years, haughty fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has been blamed for the increased power of overburden and corpulence in the U.S. (Bray, Nielsen, & Poplin, 2004). It is offer in manifold foods, including those we would forebode to invent it in, such as candy, to those unlocked-for, including salad verbiage. If your definite call starts delay the collecting A-L you are assigned the "pro" face. If your definite call starts delay the collecting M-Z, you are assigned the "con" face. The "pro" face procure bring-about a instance that HFCS has contributed to the increased whole burden of Americans. The "con" face procure bring-about a instance that HFCS has not contributed to the increased whole burden of Americans. Consider why Americans may or may not adopt foods delay HFCS, including consume, chattels on nutritional foothold, and what other nutrients may be supposing in foods that typically hold HFCS. You must tail up your reasoning delay creditable references, which includes philosophical register creed that can be accessed through the South University Online library. Remember that we are discussing this theme to collect from one another's scrutiny and that the face that someone may be defending may not be what they verily believe; content be skin and circumspect in your posts. Reference: Bray, G., Nielsen, S., & Popkin, B. (2004). Consumption of haughty-fructose corn syrup           in beverages may play a role in the communicated of corpulence. American Register of           Clinical Nutrition, 79(4), 537-543.