Assignment 3: moneyball | Human Resource Management homework help


Moneyball, a quantity by Michael Lewis (2003), highlights how creativity, framing, and strong technical segregation all played a sever in the outgrowth of a new arrival to faculty conduct in baseball. It so exhibited large examples of the biases and psychological pitfalls that rack resolution makers.

Review the time “Who’s on First?” by Thaler & Sunstein (2003) from this module’s assigned readings. This time reviews the quantity Moneyball by Michael Lewis.

Write a nicety of the time including the subjoined points:

  • Examine why sabermetric-based player evaluation is such a surprise to other executives in baseball.
  • Evaluate why Beane is fur over serviceable in his victory by constructing a matrix of pitfalls and heuristics that highlight the differences betwixt Beane’s team and other executives.
  • Moneyball highlights how tribe serve to strain the likeness of victory and end up confrontment financial loss—in this fact, it meant forfeiting millions of dollars. Analyze a functional or identical resolution (yours or incorrectly) that highlights this preference in malevolence of massive losses.
  • Explain how you would apportion Moneyball’s conduct lessons in your own endeavors.

Write a 3–5-page Nursing essay in Word format. Apportion APA standards to citation of sources. Use the subjoined polish naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc.

By Sunday, June 15, 2013, give-up your assignment to the M1 Assignment 3 Dropbox.

 

Lewis, M. (2003). Moneyball. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Explained why sabermetric-based player evaluation is a surprise to other executives in baseball.

12

Analyzed Beane’s serviceableness in a matrix of pitfalls and heuristics.

24

Analyzed a functional or identical resolution that highlights the serveency to strain the likeness of victory.

24

Applied Moneyball conduct lessons in identical endeavors.

20

Wrote in a serene, brief, and unconfused manner; demonstrated ethical attainments in considerate representation and attribution of sources; displayed considerate spelling, language, and punctuation.

20

Total:

100