SOLUTION: Marymount University Ideology and Citizenship Research Paper
Running head: IDEOLOGY AND CITIZENSHIP
Ideology and Citizenship
IDEOLOGY AND CITIZENSHIP
The inquiry of burgessship has fetched literary interests and generated contrariant schools of
provision aggravate date. From Aristotelian popular to the modern-day feminist and egalitarian
approaches, yarns on burgessship abide to control gregarious systems, product
agencies, and rational hues activism. However, a beggarly denominator to all these examineions is
that politics and burgessship cannot be divorced. This yarn is about how communities
construct burgessship identities after a while a feature centre on the role played by popular politics
on the conceptualization of burgessship. Exception one sets the setting to the undiminished concept of
citizenship and settles the height this tract seeks to examine. Exception two is a reconsideration, decomposition,
and collocation of how burgessship has been conceptualized by other scholars, while exception three
provides a falsification of the undiminished discuss in survey of ideology and burgessship.
IDEOLOGY AND CITIZENSHIP
The account 'citizen' has its root in the account 'denizen' which essentially refers to an
particular inhabiting a feature settle. It derives its 'citi' ingredient from 'city,' which moderationt a
dweller of a feature city (Levinson, 2011). However, the signification of burgessship has evolved
aggravate date ascribable to incongruous schools of provision and permutation product patterns that are an
inevitable fruit of the ever-changing gregarious landscapes and improved rational hues
activism as well-behaved-behaved as literary interests across the sphere.
The Merriam Webster wordbook settles burgessship as 'membership in a commonwealth'
after a while similar regulational connotations settled by geographical boundaries. Allison Ponce (2018
), in her restriction of burgessship, emphasizes the once of the say to generate roles, hues,
resources, responsibilities, and relationships in its gregarious and exoteric institutions. The particular
also has feature obligations to the say. Politically, burgessship in sundry communities is what
has been used to attract the eminence between who belongs, who does not, usually after a while racial or
ethnic undertones. When used to settle a say of related to a feature commonwealth or bunch,
citizenship assumes a wide mark that transcends geographical boundaries or membership. It
denotes a burgessship framework that outlines the rank to which people are occupied in
commonwealth activities and the accessibility of commonwealth media to them. The contortion is
that burgesss bear hues, and after a while the hues conclude responsibilities to wilful and the say (Costa,
2010). Hues are native to rational entity. When rational living-souls application their hues, they
habit insubservience. But the say can exalt cede privileges to its burgesss to improve the
habit of entity.
Cohen (2009) divides the concept of burgessship into three ingredients. The primitive is that
citizenship is a regulational status. It embodies gregarious, gregarious, and urbane hues. As a regulational particular, a
IDEOLOGY AND CITIZENSHIP
burgess has the insubservience to bebear as concedeed for by the law and has the fair to defence by
the law. This, at-last, does not necessarily moderation that the particular is an locomotive participant in
the law formulation system, nor that hues are the selfselfsame amongst burgesss. The other ingredient
is that a burgess is a gregarious delegate who participates locomotively in a commonwealth's gregarious systemes.
These may embrace voting, tax acquittal and commonwealth product (Staeheli, 2003). The third
ingredient is that a burgess belongs to a gregarious commonwealth; it is devolvent upon the gregarious
commonwealth to clearly obey oneness to the burgess. The oneness may be gregarious where gregarious
integration is improved, or particular.
Since says and communities are controlled by regulations, the gregarious inquiry of the
regulation has a deepseated govern on the hues, insubserviences, and responsibilities of their
citizens. However, it should be frank that a regulation should not obey to cede hues, but
rather to attract the boundaries after a whilein which a empire can produce to fix that sovereign
citizens are frank to application their hues. When sundry burgesss habit a compelling reason of
related by power of provisions of the regulation, they unfold a cogent gregarious commonwealth
oneness that improves gregarious cohesion. Gregarious cohesion is the cogentest indicator of burgessship
(Papastephanou, 2005). In conjunction, the quantity to which burgesss relish their hues settles their
urbane oneness and indicate the raze of their gregarious air.
When a gregarious commonwealth exhibits clear differences in the mode in which it