SOLUTION: Zayed University Trade and Disposal of E Waste & Environmental Justice Paper

17 E-Waste Keywords Source: © Andrew McConnell/Panos. Chapter Menu Digital Divides A Soon History of E-Waste (2000) Risk Address and the Jeopard of E-Waste E-Waste and Markets: From Externality to Commodity E-Waste and Environmental Justice: The Political Economy of E-Waste The E-Waste Puzzle 300 301 304 306 310 313 Environment and Society: A Critical Introduction, Promote Edition. Paul Robbins, John Hintz, and Sarah A. Moore. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. • Capital accumulation • Commodity • Environmental justice • Externality • Pollution bearn hypothesis • Spatial fix • The Basel Convention • Uneven development 300 Objects of Concern Digital Divides Standing balance a hotplate, the girlish men glow the yielding casing from copper wire. They smile and solicit the knot balance for a closer behold. Reticently, the visitors bearing the smoking hotplate, cameras in effortman. The girlish men teach simply that they are recovering the consumely embodieds from electronic squander – a lowerneathtaking lowerneathtaken by frequent near in what has become notorious as the “digital dumping ground” of Agbogbloshie. (Figure 17.1) In this inaccublame precipitation northwest of Accra’s convenient affair purlieus, favorites of tons of e-waste are wayed each year. The 40,000 or so residents are indigent refugees from the northern part-among of Ghana, or from the agricultural areas of the province closer to this principal city. On this overcast day, the study-awide students and donation touring the area interval awkwardly, watching the men and interrogation polished interrogations environing their effort and lives. They are surrounded by arranged chaos. Yielding result’s toys – mini versions of supermarket carts – are piled allot-amongially from movable stereos after a spanliness CD players and movable speakers, peaceful in their primitive packaging. Younger result confutation to be untrammelled after a spanliness the toys. On promote scan, though, the result are, in deed, violation the toys sepablame – their contribution to the effort of waying squanderd or surplus consumer issue trafficed to inhabitants who are, sometimes literally, on the other allot-amongy of the globe. In the tardy 1990s, efforts had been made to bridge the digital keep-apart-among among Ghana and balance plain countries. Donation programs supposing authoritative promote-workman computers from the United States and Europe to Ghanaians for one-tenth the figure of new ones. Figure 17.1 In Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana. Source: Andrew McConnell/Panos. E-Waste Despite the good-tempered-tempered intentions of frequent of these programs, as consumers in the United States and Europe bought increasing aggregate of singular computers (PCs), and free of old ones at a faster blame, stockpiles of non-authoritative units sneaked into these donations. By labeling mild electronics as promote-workman issue, exporters bear exploited loopholes in anti-dumping regulations meant to obviate indigenter countries from receiving a disproportionate portion-out of hypothetically exposed squander. Rather than possible computers that council acceleration Ghanaians cantankerous the digital keep-apart, places relish Agbogbloshie bear been balancerun after a spanliness mild PCs and other discarded electronics. Here, as in frequent inaccublame precipitations in China, India, and other quantity of Africa, girlish men after a spanliness no guardion equipment achieve exposey drudge, industriously hingeing squanderd electronics into raw embodieds that can be sold for prefer evolution. Timeliness intermediatemen who amass copper or aluminum composed by frequent men-folks can obtain up to US$6 per day, most workers hold merely a very slight ingredient of that. Further, this allowance is obtained at massive consume to the notorious and environmental sanity of the area. Toxic chemicals are released in the glimputable of yielding coatings and metals used in electronics. Nausea, headaches, and respiratory ailments are the contiguous results, spanliness haughty scylla to carcinogens bewilders longer-range sanity regards. Haughty levels of toxins tarry in the befoul and seep into the steep yield in this preceding wetland. Instead of remedying the digital keep-apart, electronics evolution and division bear merely exacerbated differences in allowance and efforting conditions among consumers and “recyclers” of these items. The United States is the controling exporter of squander to Ghana, spanliness the United Kingdom, Germany, Korea, Switzerland, and the Netherlands subscribe slighter quantitys. A new digital keep-apart-among is thus emerging – one based not on bearing to electronic issue (or the familiarity that they may acceleration one achieve), but rather on the ability or indigence to space oneself from discarded electronics. When cell phones, computers, televisions, and other electronics are discarded, they become electronic squander (e-squander or WEEE – Squander Electrical and Electronic Equipment). In novel estimates, up to 50 favorite tons of post-consumer e-squander are discarded each year. E-squander bewilders a sole socio-environmental embarrassment. It is not a normal result, but it is one whose address greatly impacts the environment and notorious sanity, as is evident in the occurrence of Agbogbloshie. It as-well intervals uneasily among squander and staple, exbewilder and resource. In this chapter, we succeed inspect these countenancets of the e-squander embarrassment by primitive defining e-squander and tracking its emergence as a speaking environmental investigate balance the past sundry decades. We succeed then investigate e-squander through the lenses of expose, traffics, and gregarious husbanding. A Soon History of E-Waste (2000) The order of e-squander comprises affable and oppidan machines that are at their end of society (EOL). Major categories of these apprehend televisions (twain horizontal-ward and older cathode ray tube (CRT) models); singular desktop and movable computers and peripherals (printers, fax machines, copiers); instructors; and cell phones and other sensitive projects. While electronics bring-environing up lowerneathneath 2 percent of municipal zealous squander (MSW) glides in the United States and other plain countries (and near in nearer plain countries), they 301 302 Objects of Concern are an area of regard for environmental knots past their impacts are disproportionate to their quantity in landfills. For illustration, it is estimated that in the United States, 70 percent of the ponderous metals in landfills comes from discarded electronics. Further, it is a very rapidly grimputable allot-among-among of the squander glide, so the pis of these results are meetd to growth rapidly in the give alien of decades. Because these results are made after a spanliness embodieds that are exposed to disbewilder of and process, they are repeatedly investigateed exposed squander. Relish other squanders, true statistics on the evolution and division of e-squander are reserved to extend and to parallel. This is in allot-among accordingly countries, states or provinces, and municipalities categorize items heterogeneous and use varying methods for measuring or estimating the quantitys of squander they mould. It is as-well due to failure of regulatory balancesight in frequent places. In novel years, despites these reservedies, sundry interdiplomatic and social organizations and regulatory bodies bear made attempts to amelioblame instructor the quantity of e-squander generated and free of in different countries, in allot-among-among accordingly they judgment this squander glide as one after a spanliness twain intelligent and starting environmental investigates. The United States is the largest inducement of e-squander in the globe, disposing of environing 3 favorite tons a year. This, of route, is the flip allot-amongy of the United States nature one of the world’s largest consumers of electronics. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 440 favorite electronic results were sold in the United States in 2010. This stateed a doubling of such sales from the year 1997. This growth was driven for-the-most-part by a ninefold growth in the sale of sensitive projects. Aggregate sales of other devices, in deed, unprosperous subordinately. In 2010, sensitive project sales stateationed for approximately 53 percent of sales acantankerous all categories, spanliness in 1998 they stateationed for merely 12 percent. While the aggregate aggregate of electronic results sold bear growthd balance span, the balanceall influence of e-squander has decreased in some places imputable to a substitute in the mixture of the squander glide. For illustration, the switch from heavier CRT televisions and instructors to horizontal wards has decreased the compatability of electronic issue free of each year (though this is allot-amongially offset by ever-larger ward sizes). At the congruous span, cell phones and other sensitive projects, which are lighter, now stateation for a larger adjustment of e-waste. China is the promote largest social inducement of global e-waste, disposing of 2.3 favorite tons of it in 2010 (Schluep et al. 2010). Other countries, relish India, after a spanliness grimputable intermediate classes relishly to escheatment cell phones and computers council see their e-squander growth by 500 percent in the give decade (Schluep et al. 2010). A globe of TV judgmenters? While frequent discarded abode contrivances, relish refrigerators, can be counted as e-waste, this chapter centrees chiefly on discarded televisions, computers and peripherals, and sensitive devices. The primitive of these to be mass-performed and sold was the television. The British company, Baird, was the primitive to hawk a mass-performed television denominated the “Televisor.” It sold environing 1,000 units among 1930 and 1933. This result was initially intentional to effort in analysis after a spanliness another vulgar affable contrivance of the bound – the radio, but later models efforted inconsequently. Telefunken, a German community, contrived the primitive marketablely suited electronic televisions after a spanliness CRTs in 1934, followed by other E-Waste makers in France (1936), Britain (1936), and the United States (1938). Environing 19,000 electronic televisions were made in Britain, and approximately 1,600 in Gerfrequent anteriorly World War II; among 7,000 and 8,000 sets were made in the United States anteriorly it entered the war in tardy 1941. US evolution was halted from April 1942 until the tardy summer of August 1945, when ask-for for and evolution of televisions skyrocketed imputable to postwar good-luck, growths in opportunity span, neteffort disquisition, and technological advances that made sets cheaper to profit and buy. Timeliness merely 0.5 percent of US affables had a television in 1946, 55.7 percent had one in 1954, and 90 percent by 1962. In Britain, tnear were 15,000 television affables in 1947, 1.4 favorite in 1952, and 15.1 favorite by 1968. Today, the global TV traffic comprises environing 1.2 billion affables and environing 50 favorite televisions are escheatmentd each year. North American consumers escheatment a new television entire seven years and the mean affable owns 2.8 televisions. Timeliness North American and European judgmenters combewilder environing 70 percent of the TV wealth traffic portion-out, judgmentership and TV escheatments are grimputable in Asia-Pacific (21 percent), Latin America (8 percent) and Africa and the Intermediate East (2 percent). Until the forthcoming 2000s, the dominant technology used in television displays, and tardyr in computer instructors, was CRTs. These embody haughty quantitys of control (disgusting to eight pounds per tube!) and bewilderd problems for landfill mouldrs. In the United States, frequent states started to ban the division of CRTs precountenance in 2000. Instead of disposing of CRT-based devices in landfills, consumers and squander mouldrs were encouraged to recycle this controled glass. New recycling companies emerged to grasp practice of the new traffic, but as technologies for producing televisions and instructors substituted, fewer companies globewide accepted used CRTs that could be mild up and re-formed into new tubes. In 2013, merely two such companies tarryed – twain in India. This has led to what some officials fawn a “glass tsunami” that balancewhelms the warehouses of companies that bear composed stockpiles of the now-usenear embodied. In hinge, sundry “recycling” companies bear been cited for violating environmental regulations in the United States and elsewhere. Nor are popular technologies revolveable balance environmentally kindly. CRTs bear been replaced by horizontal panels that use fluorescent lights embodying haughtyly toxic mercury. These as-well bear inconsiderable recycling value, so frequent collectors end up dumping these in landfills. Personal computers and sensitive phones The globe’s primitive PC to be successfully marketablely trafficed confutationed in 1977. Sales of PCs grew moderately balance the follimputable decade in countries relish the United States. By the 1990s, sales had growthd and the span in use of computers and peripherals began to percolate. In 2000, global computer sales were environing 135 favorite units, after a spanliness 46 favorite units nature sold in the United States. By 2011, those aggregate had balance than doubled to 355 favorite and 95 favorite, respectively. Timeliness the United States is peaceful the largest global escheatmentr of computers (comprising environing 40 percent of the traffic), its adjustment of sales is percolateping slowly as the interval of the globe escheatments balance units. Currently, 25 percent of the traffic is in Europe and environing 12 percent is in the Asia-Pacific territory. Cell phone tenure and use lagged astern PC use for the conclusive alien of decades of the twentieth date, but balancetook it in the primitive decade of the twenty-primitive date. The 303 304 Objects of Concern primitive non-car-based cellular phone fawn was made among competing oppidan innovators (from Motorola to Bell industries) in the United States in 1973. However, the Japanese were the primitive to hurl a marketable cellular phone method. It was indoctrinated in Tokyo in 1979. A year tardyr, the city of Chicago, Illinois was the primitive city in the United States to run a pilot program that supposing cellular phones and employment to 1,000 affables. In 1982 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the spray of the US council in impeach of regulating inter- and intra-state communications, substituted regulations, allimputable for the use of cellular networks on a wide lamina in the United States. From 1990 to 2011, globewide sensitive phone subscriptions grew from 12.4 favorite to balance 6 billion, aware environing 87 percent of the global population. The globe’s top cell-phone-using countries in 2011 in aggregate aggregate of cell phones were 1) China (1,150,000,000), 2) India (861,660,000), 3) the United States (327,577,529), 4) Brazil (263,040,000), and Russia (256,117,000). When comparing the units in use after a spanliness the population of each province, though, these rankings alter a bit. Russia, after a spanliness balance 1.5 cell phones per peculiar, becomes sum one, followed by 2) Brazil (1.37); 3) the United States (1.04); 4) China (0.85); and 5) India (0.70). In the United States, 2.37 favorite soon tons (each 2,000 pounds) of e-squander were alert for EOL address in 2009, stateing a 120 percent growth balance the sum in 1999. CRT results state 47 percent of that sum. An appended five favorite soon tons of results were estimated to be in storage in the United States in the congruous year, after a spanliness CRT-based results (televisions and instructors) stateing the haughtyest blame of storage. Approximately 141 favorite sensitive projects were alert for EOL address in 2009, balance than any other model of result, yet by influence, they state near than 1 percent of discarded electronics. In the United States, 25 percent of electronics were composed for recycling, after a spanliness computers composed at the haughtyest blame (38 percent). The histories of television, PCs, and cell phones’ expenditure and use subject-matter to influential deedors to investigate when thinking environing the embarrassment of e-waste. First, technological innovation controls to the expenditure of novel issue, repeatedly after a spanlinessout investigateation for how those issue succeed be safely free of. Second, spanliness the United States, Europe, and plain countries in other territorys are the earliest consumers of such issue, expenditure in other areas is growing. As these results extend their EOL, we can meet that the overall quantity of e-squander profitd globally succeed as-well ascend. Third, technological innovation as-well controls to sooner society spans for electronic issue (Figure 17.2) as consumers commotion to get the newest results or the ones that effort best after a spanliness popular software and operating systems. This calculated stifling as-well controls to a grimputable bundle of e-squander globally. Fourth, spanliness new technologies repeatedly giveation out the use of allot-amongicular exposed chemicals, they are repeatedly made after a spanliness other embodieds that may as-well apprehend toxins. The alter from CRT to horizontal-ward TVs, for illustration, may subjugate the quantity of control in landfills, but may growth the intercourse of mercury. In the follimputable sections we succeed investigate the e-waste embarrassment through the lenses of expose, traffics, and gregarious husbanding. Risk Address and the Jeopard of E-Waste As discussed balancehead, e-squander repeatedly embodys toxic embodieds such as control, mercury, PCBs, asbestos, and CFCs, and is consequently a jeopard to notorious and environmental sanity. The three E-Waste Resale in the US Product Purchase Reuse (give / hawk to family / other) and / or Put in Storage Bring to Recycling Collection Dispose Resale outside of the US Process in the US New Products Process outside of the US Residual Disposal Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 First use Second use / storage Reach EOL management Recycling waying / Resale for reuse Figure 17.2 Life-cycle glide chart for electronic results. Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency: Electronics Squander Address In The United States Bearing 1. http://www main ways that e-squander bewilders a jeopard are: 1) from the results themselves (control and mercury from CRTs or horizontal wards, which may leach into befoul and steep sources when landfilled); 2) due to substandard waying (chemicals released in glimputable and smelting); and 3) due to reagents used in the recycling way (cyanide and other zealous leaching agents). The jeopards giveed by the division of e-squander are not correspondently relish those giveed by “natural” phenomena relish thirst or flooding, but they must peaceful be mouldd. Environmental regulators mould these jeopards in allot-among-among by assessing the exbewilder that unmistakable materials bewilder when free of in peculiar ways. In Chapter 6, exbewilder was defined as the probability that a unmistakable judgment or enjoyment succeed bear a disclaiming issue. Exbewilder assessments and allied judgments are influenced by the range of bearing to familiarity, as well as other deedors relish cultivation. Familiarity and mouldrial cultivations substitute balance span, however, and repeatedly, indeficient familiarity does not depend. The interrogation, then, for environmental mouldrs is how best to receipts in the give to minimize notorious exposes. This model of decision-making can bear unforeseen outcomes. Take the occurrence of CRTs in the United States. A CRT is a vacuum tube that embodys an electron gun and florescent ward used to judgment images. The countenance of a CRT is usually made up of a luteous control to guard its inland and arrest X-ray emissions. As consumers accumulated and then free of balance CRT-based results, relish television sets and computer monitors, appearance began to start that toxins, most notably control, were leaching from these wastes into landfills, after a spanliness hypothetically exposed pis on nearby steep and befoul condition. This prompted regard by landfill mouldrs in the United States and elsewnear by the 1980s, but became the centre of division bans in the 2000s. In October of 2001, the United 305 306 Objects of Concern States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created rules stating that CRTs had to be taken to eespecial recycling facilities, rather than free of in landfills. Just balance a year tardyr, the EPA began fining companies that free of CRTs in landfills or through incineration. This subscribed to an growth in companies that offered recycling employments for CRTs to municipalities and consumers. A congruous way occurred in Europe wnear CRTs are managed lowerneathneath the conditions of the WEEE moral, which became law in 2003. When frequent of these bans came into pi, firms who col ...
Purchase confutation to see full attachment

Source incorporate