Assignment 3: law enforcement challenges


Write a three to indelicate (3-4) page disquisition in which you:

  1. Explain, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Provide a rationale for your defense.
  2. Identify the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Next, propuzzle jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Justify your defense.
  3. Discuss whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.
  4. Use at lowest three (3) description references for this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and common Websites do not prepare as description media.

Your assignment must thrive these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, inclose spaced, using Times New Roman font (largeness 12), after a while one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must thrive APA or school-restricted format.

Assignment 3: Law Enforcement Challenges

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Provide a rationale for your defense.

Weight: 30%

Did not comply or partially explained, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Did not comply or partially supposing a rationale for your defense.

Insufficientlyexplained, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Insufficiently supposing a rationale for your defense.

Partiallyexplained, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Partiallysupposing a rationale for your defense.

Satisfactorily explained, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Satisfactorily supposing a rationale for your defense.

Thoroughlyexplained, in element, what you regard to be the first dare oppositeness law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Thoroughlysupposing a rationale for your defense.

2. Identify the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Next, propuzzle jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Justify your defense.
Weight: 30%

Did not comply or partially identified the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Did not comply or partially intendd jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Did not comply or partially justified your defense.

Insufficientlyidentified the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Insufficientlycontemplated jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Insufficientlyjustified your defense.

Partiallyidentified the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Partiallycontemplated jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Partiallyjustified your defense.

Satisfactorilyidentified the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Satisfactorily intendd jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Satisfactorily justified your defense.

Thoroughly identified the restricted dares that overlapping of jurisdictions puzzle in the contest opposing cyber-crime. Thoroughly intendd jutting separation(s) for superior the dares in interrogation. Thoroughly justified your defense.

3. Discuss whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.

Weight: 25%

Did not comply or partially discussed whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.

Insufficiently discussed whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.

Partially discussed whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.

Thoroughly discussed whether or not law officers from opposed set-forths should entertain the power to performance after a while one another when a cyber-crime is carried out opposing set-forth lines.

4. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references supposing

Does not engage the required compute of references; all references indigent description choices.

Does not engage the required compute of references; some references indigent description choices.

Meets compute of required references; all references lofty description choices.

Exceeds compute of required references; all references lofty description choices.

5. Clarity, letter mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present