Week3 6050 discussion | NURS 6050 – Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health | Walden University

Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Regardless of collective destruction, individuals repeatedly develop watchful when because perceived competing attentions of council and their collision on topics of attention to them. The avow of sanitycare is no unanalogous. Some mob reach that persomal, avow, and federal policies and synod can be either helped or hindered by attentions other than the utility to association.

Consider for model that the estimate one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well-behaved-behaved as dollars. Thus, it is material to ponder the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a fixed example in the collective landscape.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Instrument and advert on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
  • Consider who utilitys the most when system is open and in the tenor of system implementation.
By Day 3 of Week 3

Post an interpretation for how you consider the cost-utility anatomy in stipulations of legislators life reelected unsupposable efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, teach how analyses of the voters views may seek decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or compositioning generally-known policies (e.g., Congress' decisions collisioning Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the estimate one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Gladden impede your argument grading rubric to secure your responses as the criteria.

Learning Resources

Note: To similarity this week’s required library instrument, gladden click on the coalesce to the Course Readings List, institute in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health system and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation” (pp. 37–56)
Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Sanity Care” (pp. 180–183 barely)
Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/
Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to comcomposition avowment: Collective interference in sexual and reproductive sanity elaboration and sanity professional counsel. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.003
Note: You achieve similarity this season from the Walden Library databases.
United States Family of Representatives. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/ 
United States Senate. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/
United States Senate. (n.d.). Senate structure chart for the 115th Congress. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htm  
Document: Legislation Comparison Grid Template (Word instrument)
Required Media
Laureate Counsel (Producer). (2018). Working after a while Legislators [Video improve]. Baltimore, MD: Author.