Case analysis – collaborating with outside providers | PSY 650 Introduction to Clinical & Counseling Psychology | Ashford University


 4 Full Pages Well-Written Paper   Due 1/8/2018 NO LATER   NO PLAGIARISM

                               PSY 650 Week Three Matter Plan Attached

Due 1/8/2018 NO LATER         PLEASE FOLLOW DIRECTIONS

Prior to commencement effect on this assignment, decipher the PSY650 Week Three Matter Plan Preview the document and Circumstance 9: Bulimia Nervosa in Gorenstein and Comer (2014). Content too decipher the Waller, Gray, Hinrichsen, Mounford, Lawson, and Patient (2014) “Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa and Atypical Bulimic Nervosa: Competency in Clinical Settings,”Halmi (2013) “Perplexities of Matter Resistance in Eating Disorders,” and DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration Betwixt Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Matter of Eating Disorders” catechism.

Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this circumstance consider. In your paper, content embrace the subjoined.

  • 1. Explain the junction betwixt each speculative orientation used by Dr. Heston and the matter intrusion plans utilized in the circumstance.

  • 2. Describe the cognitive-behavioral example of the means-of-prop of bulimia nervosa.

  • 3. Explain why Rita was averse to share in Dr. Heston’s beg for her to retain a chronicles of her eating behaviors. Use advice from the Halmi (2013) expression “Perplexities of Matter Resistance in Eating Disorders” to aid prop your statements.

  • 4. Recommend beyond providers (psychiatrists, medical doctors, nutritionists, political effecters, holistic practitioners, etc.) to the succor Rita in achieving her matter goals. Use advice from the DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration betwixt Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Matter of Eating Disorders” expression to aid prop your recommendations.

  • 5. Describe some of the challenges and ghostly issues that Dr. Heston may confront when effecting collaboratively after a while the professionals that you recommended.  Apply ghostly principles and standards of psychology bearing to your term of Dr. Heston’s undeveloped collaboration after a while beyond providers.

  • 6. Evaluate the competency of the matter intrusions implemented by Dr. Heston, proping your statements after a while advice from the circumstance and two to three peer-reviewed catechism from the Ashford University Library.

  • 7. Recommend three added matter intrusions that would be expend in this circumstance. The recommended catechism for this week may be serviceable in generating your vindication to this proof. Justify your selections after a while advice from the circumstance.

  • 4 Full Pages Well-Written Paper   Due 1/8/2018 NO LATER   NO PLAGIARISM